ReviewIndian heart journal
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mild heart failure is a reversal therapy.
Review in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction efficiency of serum cystatin C for clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum to "Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mild heart failure is a reversal therapy" [Indian Heart J. 69 (1) (2017) 112-118].Ali-Hassan-Sayegh, Sadegh [corrected to Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq]
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the efficacy, safety of implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in mild heart failure (HF). Medline, Embase, Elsevier, and Sciences online database as well as Google scholar literature were used for selecting appropriate studies with randomized controlled design. The literature search of all major databases retrieved 2035 studies. After screening, a total of 10 trials were identified that reported outcomes of interest. Pooled analysis was performed on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (P<0.001), LV end-diastolic volume (P<0.001), LV end-systolic volume (P<0.001), LV end-diastolic diameter (P<0.001), LV end-systolic diameter (P<0.001), incidence of progression of heart failure (P<0.001), mortality (P=0.06), infection (P=0.1), and pneumothorax (P=0.08). Overall, implantation of CRT in patients with asymptomatic and mild HF resulted in improved cardiac function, decreased progression of HF, trend to decrease of mortality in short to long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.