SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2017
Information needs for making clinical recommendations about potential drug-drug interactions: a synthesis of literature review and interviews.
Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions and associated factors among outpatients and inpatients in Ethiopian hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2020Pooled it
- An Assessment of Different Decision Support Software from the Perspective of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cognitive task analysis of clinicians' drug-drug interaction management during patient care and implications for alert design.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Bayesian multitask learning for medicine recommendation based on online patient reviews.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Similarity and consistency assessment of three major online drug-drug interaction resources.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Detecting drug-drug interactions between therapies for COVID-19 and concomitant medications through the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Potential drug-drug interactions of antiretrovirals and antimicrobials detected by three databases.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A Minimal Information Model for Potential Drug-Drug Interactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Testing the face validity and inter-rater agreement of a simple approach to drug-drug interaction evidence assessment.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Article
- Automatically classifying the evidence type of drug-drug interaction research papers as a step toward computer supported evidence curation.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020Article
- Identifying Common Methods Used by Drug Interaction Experts for Finding Evidence About Potential Drug-Drug Interactions: Web-Based Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Potential drug-drug interactions and associated factors among hospitalized cardiac patients at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia.SAGE open medicine · 2019Article
- Drug interaction screening in SWOG clinical trials.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2018Article
- Drug-drug Interaction-related Uncontrolled Glycemia.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug information compendia and drug-drug interaction information databases are critical resources for clinicians and pharmacists working to avoid adverse events due to exposure to potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs). Our goal is to develop information models, annotated data, and search tools that will facilitate the interpretation of PDDI information. To better understand the information needs and work practices of specialists who search and synthesize PDDI evidence for drug information resources, we conducted an inquiry that combined a thematic analysis of published literature with unstructured interviews.
methodsStarting from an initial set of relevant articles, we developed search terms and conducted a literature search. Two reviewers conducted a thematic analysis of included articles. Unstructured interviews with drug information experts were conducted and similarly coded. Information needs, work processes, and indicators of potential strengths and weaknesses of information systems were identified.
resultsReview of 92 papers and 10 interviews identified 56 categories of information needs related to the interpretation of PDDI information including drug and interaction information; study design; evidence including clinical details, quality and content of reports, and consequences; and potential recommendations. We also identified strengths/weaknesses of PDDI information systems.
conclusionsWe identified the kinds of information that might be most effective for summarizing PDDIs. The drug information experts we interviewed had differing goals, suggesting a need for detailed information models and flexible presentations. Several information needs not discussed in previous work were identified, including temporal overlaps in drug administration, biological plausibility of interactions, and assessment of the quality and content of reports. Richly structured depictions of PDDI information may help drug information experts more effectively interpret data and develop recommendations. Effective information models and system designs will be needed to maximize the utility of this information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.