ArticleStatistics in medicine2017
Bayesian semiparametric variable selection with applications to periodontal data.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- BMI-CNV: a Bayesian framework for multiple genotyping platforms detection of copy number variants.Genetics · 2022Article
- Bayesian sparse heritability analysis with high-dimensional neuroimaging phenotypes.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Improving teeth aesthetics using a spatially shared-parameters model for independent regular lattices.Journal of applied statistics · 2021Article
- A BAYESIAN TIME-VARYING EFFECT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL MHEALTH DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2020Article
- Spatiotemporal signal detection using continuous shrinkage priors.Statistics in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A normality assumption is typically adopted for the random effects in a clustered or longitudinal data analysis using a linear mixed model. However, such an assumption is not always realistic, and it may lead to potential biases of the estimates, especially when variable selection is taken into account. Furthermore, flexibility of nonparametric assumptions (e.g., Dirichlet process) on these random effects may potentially cause centering problems, leading to difficulty of interpretation of fixed effects and variable selection. Motivated by these problems, we proposed a Bayesian method for fixed and random effects selection in nonparametric random effects models. We modeled the regression coefficients via centered latent variables which are distributed as probit stick-breaking scale mixtures. By using the mixture priors for centered latent variables along with covariance decomposition, we could avoid the aforementioned problems and allow efficient selection of fixed and random effects from the model. We demonstrated the advantages of our proposed approach over other competing alternatives through a simulated example and also via an illustrative application to a data set from a periodontal disease study. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.