Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28225784›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A novel intraperitoneal metastatic xenograft mouse model for survival outcome assessment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Md Sazzad Hassan, Niranjan Awasthi, Jun Li, Margaret A Schwarz, Roderich E Schwarz, Urs von Holzen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Targeting Lin28 axis enhances glypican-3-CAR T cell efficacy against hepatic tumor initiating cell population.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Sazzad HassanDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6309-9616
Niranjan AwasthiDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, United States of America.
Jun LiDepartment of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States of America.
Margaret A SchwarzDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, United States of America.
Roderich E SchwarzDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, United States of America.
Urs von HolzenDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has become the dominant type of esophageal cancer in United States. The 5-year survival rate of EAC is below 20% and most patients present with locally advanced or widespread metastatic disease, where current treatment is largely ineffective. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Improvement of EAC patient outcome requires well-characterized animal models in which to evaluate novel therapeutics. In this study we aimed to establish a peritoneal dissemination xenograft mouse model of EAC that would support survival outcome analyses. To find the best candidate cell line from 7 human EAC cell lines of different origin named ESO26, OE33, ESO51, SK-GT-2, OE19, OACM5.1C and Flo-1 were injected intraperitoneally/subcutaneously into SCID mice. The peritoneal/xenograft tumor formation and mouse survival were compared among different groups. All cell lines injected subcutaneously formed tumors within 3 months at variable rates. All cell lines except OACM5.1C formed intraperitoneal tumors within 3 months at variable rates. Median animal survival with peritoneal dissemination was 108 days for ESO26 cells (5X106), 65 days for OE33 cells (5X106), 88 days for ESO51 cells (5X106), 76 days for SK-GT-2 cells (5X106), 55 days for OE19 cells (5X106), 45 days for OE19 cells (10X106) and 82 days for Flo-1 cells (5X106). Interestingly, only in the OE19 model all mice (7/7 for 5X106 and 5/5 for10X106) developed bloody ascites with liver metastasis after intraperitoneal injection. The median survival time of these animals was the shortest (45 days for 10X106 cells). In addition, median survival was significantly increased after paclitaxel treatment compared with the control group (57 days versus 45 days, p = 0.0034) along with a significant decrease of the relative subcutaneous tumor volume (p = 0.00011). Thus peritoneal dissemination mouse xenograft model for survival outcome assessment after intraperitoneal injection of OE19 cells will be very useful for the evaluation of cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalEsophageal NeoplasmsHeterograftsMiceNeoplasm TransplantationPaclitaxelPeritoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID28225784
PMCPMC5321464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.