ArticleEar and hearing
Effects of Long-Term Musical Training on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implications of musical practice in central auditory processing: a systematic review.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyPooled it
- Objective verification of continuous speech sound discrimination using the acoustic change complex.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Training-induced plasticity for processing auditory temporal cues in dancers.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Overcoming the Challenge of Singing Among Cochlear Implant Users: An Analysis of the Disrupted Feedback Loop and Strategies for Improvement.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- The effect of development on cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Auditory Electrophysiological and Perceptual Measures in Student Musicians with High Sound Exposure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Efferent Control in Musicians: A Review.Audiology research · 2023Review
- Acoustic Change Complex Recorded in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2023Article
- Pitch discrimination is better for synthetic timbre than natural musical instrument timbres despite familiarity.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Musicians Show Improved Speech Segregation in Competitive, Multi-Talker Cocktail Party Scenarios.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Attentive Music Listening on Cochlear Implant Users' Speech Perception, Quality of Life, and Behavioral and Objective Measures of Frequency Change Detection.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Changes in Speech-Related Brain Activity During Adaptation to Electro-Acoustic Hearing.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Response to Frequency Changes with Varied Magnitude, Rate, and Direction.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2019Article
- Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.Hearing research · 2019Article
- Speech perception is similar for musicians and non-musicians across a wide range of conditions.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Effect of Frequency Response Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEvidence suggests that musicians, as a group, have superior frequency resolution abilities when compared with nonmusicians. It is possible to assess auditory discrimination using either behavioral or electrophysiologic methods. The purpose of this study was to determine if the acoustic change complex (ACC) is sensitive enough to reflect the differences in spectral processing exhibited by musicians and nonmusicians.
designTwenty individuals (10 musicians and 10 nonmusicians) participated in this study. Pitch and spectral ripple discrimination were assessed using both behavioral and electrophysiologic methods. Behavioral measures were obtained using a standard three interval, forced choice procedure. The ACC was recorded and used as an objective (i.e., nonbehavioral) measure of discrimination between two auditory signals. The same stimuli were used for both psychophysical and electrophysiologic testing.
resultsAs a group, musicians were able to detect smaller changes in pitch than nonmusician. They also were able to detect a shift in the position of the peaks and valleys in a ripple noise stimulus at higher ripple densities than non-musicians. ACC responses recorded from musicians were larger than those recorded from non-musicians when the amplitude of the ACC response was normalized to the amplitude of the onset response in each stimulus pair. Visual detection thresholds derived from the evoked potential data were better for musicians than non-musicians regardless of whether the task was discrimination of musical pitch or detection of a change in the frequency spectrum of the ripple noise stimuli. Behavioral measures of discrimination were generally more sensitive than the electrophysiologic measures; however, the two metrics were correlated.
conclusionsPerhaps as a result of extensive training, musicians are better able to discriminate spectrally complex acoustic signals than nonmusicians. Those differences are evident not only in perceptual/behavioral tests but also in electrophysiologic measures of neural response at the level of the auditory cortex. While these results are based on observations made from normal-hearing listeners, they suggest that the ACC may provide a non-behavioral method of assessing auditory discrimination and as a result might prove useful in future studies that explore the efficacy of participation in a musically based, auditory training program perhaps geared toward pediatric or hearing-impaired listeners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.