Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28225594›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2017

Mass Spectral Feature List Optimizer (MS-FLO): A Tool To Minimize False Positive Peak Reports in Untargeted Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (LC-MS) Data Processing.

Brian C DeFelice, Sajjan Singh Mehta, Stephanie Samra, Tomáš Čajka, Benjamin Wancewicz, Johannes F Fahrmann, Oliver Fiehn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the metabolomics "dark matter" by a detectable khipu model.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Metabolomics Data Processing Using the Asari Toolkit.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian C DeFeliceUniversity of California, Davis , West Coast Metabolomics Center, 451 E. Health Sciences Drive, Rm 1300, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Sajjan Singh MehtaUniversity of California, Davis , West Coast Metabolomics Center, 451 E. Health Sciences Drive, Rm 1300, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Stephanie SamraUniversity of California, Davis , West Coast Metabolomics Center, 451 E. Health Sciences Drive, Rm 1300, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Tomáš ČajkaUniversity of California, Davis , West Coast Metabolomics Center, 451 E. Health Sciences Drive, Rm 1300, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Benjamin WancewiczUniversity of California, Davis , West Coast Metabolomics Center, 451 E. Health Sciences Drive, Rm 1300, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Johannes F FahrmannUniversity of California, Davis , West Coast Metabolomics Center, 451 E. Health Sciences Drive, Rm 1300, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Oliver FiehnUniversity of California, Davis , West Coast Metabolomics Center, 451 E. Health Sciences Drive, Rm 1300, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-8928

Funding

West Coast Central Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource Core (WC3MRC)U24DK097154 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FIEHN, OLIVER · 2012 to 2017
$9.9M
Nutrigenetics & -genomics of Vitamin D and Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Type 1 DiabetesR01DK104351 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NORRIS, JILL M · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104351NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Untargeted metabolomics by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry generates data-rich chromatograms in the form of m/z-retention time features. Managing such datasets is a bottleneck. Many popular data processing tools, including XCMS-online and MZmine2, yield numerous false-positive peak detections. Flagging and removing such false peaks manually is a time-consuming task and prone to human error. We present a web application, Mass Spectral Feature List Optimizer (MS-FLO), to improve the quality of feature lists after initial processing to expedite the process of data curation. The tool utilizes retention time alignments, accurate mass tolerances, Pearson's correlation analysis, and peak height similarity to identify ion adducts, duplicate peak reports, and isotopic features of the main monoisotopic metabolites. Removing such erroneous peaks reduces the overall number of metabolites in data reports and improves the quality of subsequent statistical investigations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of MS-FLO, we processed 28 biological studies and uploaded raw and results data to the Metabolomics Workbench website ( www.metabolomicsworkbench.org ), encompassing 1481 chromatograms produced by two different data processing programs used in-house (MZmine2 and later MS-DIAL). Post-processing of datasets with MS-FLO yielded a 7.8% automated reduction of total peak features and flagged an additional 7.9% of features, per dataset, for review by the user. When manually curated, 87% of these additional flagged features were verified false positives. MS-FLO is an open source web application that is freely available for use at http://msflo.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu .

Indexed as

MetabolomicsSoftwareChromatography, LiquidFalse Positive ReactionsHumansMass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID28225594
PMCPMC7334838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.