Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28225088›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The general PTS component HPr determines the preference for glucose over mannitol.

Mangyu Choe, Young-Ha Park, Chang-Ro Lee, Yeon-Ran Kim, Yeong-Jae Seok

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Glucose Transport inMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transporters of glucose and other carbohydrates in bacteria.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mangyu ChoeSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 00826, Korea.
Young-Ha ParkSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 00826, Korea.
Chang-Ro LeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Myongji University, Yongin, Gyeonggido 17058, Republic of Korea.
Yeon-Ran KimSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 00826, Korea.
Yeong-Jae SeokSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 00826, Korea.
Seoul National University · KRMyongji University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preferential sugar utilization is a widespread phenomenon in biological systems. Glucose is usually the most preferred carbon source in various organisms, especially in bacteria where it is taken up via the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS). The currently proposed model for glucose preference over non-PTS sugars in enteric bacteria including E. coli is strictly dependent on the phosphorylation state of the glucose-specific PTS component, enzyme IIA

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBiological TransportEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFermentationGlucoseMannitolOperonPhosphoenolpyruvate Sugar Phosphotransferase SystemPhosphorylationRepressor ProteinsBacterial Proteinscrr protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGlucoseMannitolMtlR protein, E coliphosphocarrier protein HPrPhosphoenolpyruvate Sugar Phosphotransferase SystemRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28225088
PMCPMC5320558
OpenAlexW2591398936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.