Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224794›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2017

1.14*CM1A-LBCC: Localized Bond-Charge Corrected CM1A Charges for Condensed-Phase Simulations.

Leela S Dodda, Jonah Z Vilseck, Julian Tirado-Rives, William L Jorgensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Toughening Artificial Spider Silk via Glue-Like Nanoparticle Crosslinks.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tuning NaACS omega · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leela S DoddaDepartment of Chemistry, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107, United States.
Jonah Z VilseckDepartment of Chemistry, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107, United States.
Julian Tirado-RivesDepartment of Chemistry, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7330-189X
William L JorgensenDepartment of Chemistry, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-9520

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS FOR WATER PROTEIN INTERACTIONSR01GM032136 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JORGENSEN, WILLIAM L. · 1985 to 2023
$8.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of the 1.14*CM1A and 1.20*CM5 charge models was evaluated for calculations of free energies of hydration. For a set of 426 neutral molecules, 1.14*CM1A and 1.20*CM5 yield MADs of 1.26 and 1.21 kcal/mol, respectively. The 1.14*CM1A charges, which can be readily obtained for large systems, exhibit large deviations only for a subset of functional groups. The results for these cases were systematically improved using localized bond-charge corrections (LBCC) by which offsetting adjustments are made to the partial charges for atoms in specified bond types. Only 19 LBCCs were needed to yield 1.14*CM1A-LBCC charges that reduce the errors for the 426 ΔG

Indexed as

Quantum TheoryThermodynamicsWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID28224794
PMCPMC5813481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.