Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224768›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2017

Comparison of the Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Systems Using a Formic Acid Extraction Method to Identify Common and Uncommon Yeast Isolates.

Hyun Seung Lee, Jong Hee Shin, Min Ji Choi, Eun Jeong Won, Seung Jung Kee, Soo Hyun Kim, Myung Geun Shin, Soon Pal Suh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Candida dubliniensis fungemia in a patient with severe COVID-19: A case report.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  7. Nationwide Surveillance of Antifungal Resistance ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. "Omic" Approaches to Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Mass spectrometry in research laboratories and clinical diagnostic: a new era in medical mycology.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Review
  10. Re-classification ofiScience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Identification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hyun Seung LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Jong Hee ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. shinjh@chonnam.ac.kr.
Min Ji ChoiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Eun Jeong WonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Seung Jung KeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Soo Hyun KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Myung Geun ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Soon Pal SuhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) allows rapid and accurate identification of clinical yeast isolates. In-tube formic acid/acetonitrile (FA/ACN) extraction is recommended prior to the analysis with MALDI Biotyper, but the direct on-plate FA extraction is simpler. We compared the Biotyper with the VITEK MS for the identification of various clinically relevant yeast species, focusing on the use of the FA extraction method.

methodsWe analyzed 309 clinical isolates of 42 yeast species (four common Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, and 37 uncommon yeast species) using the Biotyper and VITEK MS systems. FA extraction was used initially for all isolates. If 'no identification' result was obtained following the initial FA extraction, these samples were then retested by using FA (both systems, additive FA) or FA/ACN (Biotyper only, additive FA/ACN) extraction. These results were compared with those obtained by sequence-based identification.

resultsBoth systems correctly identified all 158 isolates of the four common Candida species after the initial FA extraction. The Biotyper correctly identified 8.7%, 30.4%, and 100% of 23 C. neoformans isolates after performing initial FA, additive FA, and FA/ACN extractions, respectively, while VITEK MS identified all C. neoformans isolates after the initial FA extraction. Both systems had comparable identification rates of 37 uncommon yeast species (128 isolates), following the initial FA (Biotyper, 74.2%; VITEK MS, 73.4%) or additive FA (Biotyper, 82.0%; VITEK MS, 73.4%).

conclusionsThe identification rate of most common and uncommon yeast isolates is comparable between simple FA extraction/Biotyper method and VITEK MS methods, but FA/ACN extraction is necessary for C. neoformans identification by Biotyper.

Indexed as

CandidaCryptococcus neoformansFormatesSolid Phase ExtractionSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationYeastsFormatesformic acidBiotyperCandidaFormic acid extractionMatrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)VITEK MSYeast

Identifiers

PMID28224768
PMCPMC5339094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.