Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224681›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2018

Modeling human methamphetamine use patterns in mice: chronic and binge methamphetamine exposure, reward function and neurochemistry.

James P Kesby, Ariel Chang, Athina Markou, Svetlana Semenova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neural Circuitry of Salience and Reward Processing in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Neurotransmitter system aberrations in patients with drug addiction.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James P KesbyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5814-8062
Ariel ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Athina MarkouDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Svetlana SemenovaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

STRUCTURAL NEUROIMAGING COREP30MH062512 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jennifer E Iudicello · 2001 to 2026
$50.4M
Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center (TMARC)P50DA026306 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GRANT, IGOR · 2009 to 2018
$33.9M
Interdisciplinary Research Fellowship in NeuroAIDSR25MH081482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MARIANA CHERNER · 2007 to 2026
$5.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA026306NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062512NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH081482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different methamphetamine use patterns in human subjects may contribute to inconsistent findings regarding the effects of methamphetamine abuse on brain and behavior. The present study investigated whether human-derived chronic and binge methamphetamine use patterns have differential effects on reward and neurochemistry in mice. Brain reward function in mice was evaluated during acute/prolonged withdrawal, and in response to methamphetamine challenge using the intracranial self-stimulation procedure. Brain dopaminergic, serotonergic and glutamatergic neurochemistry was determined with high-performance liquid chromatography. Chronic and binge regimens induced withdrawal-related decreases in reward function that were more severe during the binge regimen during cycles 1-2. Despite large differences in methamphetamine dose, both regimens induced similar reward deficits during cycles 3-4. Neither methamphetamine regimen led to persistent alterations in the sensitivity to the reward-enhancing effects of acute methamphetamine challenge. The binge regimen severely depleted striatal dopamine levels and increased brain glutamine levels. The chronic regimen had milder effects on striatal dopamine levels and altered cortical dopamine and serotonin levels. This work highlights that the magnitude of acute/prolonged withdrawal may not reflect amount or frequency of methamphetamine intake. In contrast, the array of underlying neurochemical alterations was methamphetamine regimen dependent. Thus, stratifying methamphetamine-dependent individuals based on use pattern may help to cater therapeutic interventions more appropriately by targeting use pattern-specific neurotransmitter systems.

Indexed as

Amphetamine-Related DisordersAnimalsBrainCentral Nervous System StimulantsCerebral CortexCorpus StriatumDisease Models, AnimalDopamineGlutamineMethamphetamineMiceRewardSelf StimulationSerotoninCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamineGlutamineMethamphetamineSerotoninanhedoniacognitiondopamineglutamateserotoninwithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID28224681
PMCPMC5565728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.