ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2017
Appropriate Use of Genetic Testing in Congenital Heart Disease Patients.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current approach to genetic testing and genetic evaluation referrals for adults with congenital heart disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Nono deficiency impedes the proliferation and adhesion of H9c2 cardiomyocytes through Pi3k/Akt signaling pathway.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Genetic Basis of Human Congenital Heart Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020Article
- The genetics of isolated congenital heart disease.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2020Review
- Three year experience of a clinical cardiovascular genetics program for infants with congenital heart disease.Congenital heart disease · 2019Article
- Pregnancy in Women with Congenital Heart Disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCongenital heart disease (CHD) remains the most common birth defect, occurring in 1% of all births. Although the exact etiology of CHD is still largely unknown, it is thought to be an interaction of genetic and non-genetic factors. The purposes of this review are to summarize recent advances in CHD genetics and testing and to present a suggested algorithm for appropriate use of genetic testing in patients with CHD. RECENT
findingsAdvances in genetic testing technology are rapidly expanding the options for screening and are providing further insights into the genetic and molecular background of non-syndromic CHD. As the field advances, the role of the geneticist and genetic counselor will continue to expand as the testing becomes more complex and interpretation of results becomes increasingly challenging. Coordination of practice between cardiologists and geneticists using a shared clinical structure is essential and will help improve cost utilization and facilitate individualized patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28224467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.