Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224452›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2017

Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.

Sarah J Barber, Jaime J Castrellon, Philipp Opitz, Mara Mather

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Stereotype Threat Reduces the Positivity of Older Adults' Recall.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah J BarberUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. barber@sfsu.edu.
Jaime J CastrellonUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Philipp OpitzUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mara MatherUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN GERONTOLOGYT32AG000037 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, EILEEN M CRIMMINS · 1985 to 2026
$13.2M
The Impact of Emotional Regulation on Cognition in AgingR01AG025340 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2004 to 2021
$7.9M
The effects of stress on neural processing of reward and riskR01AG038043 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Brain Mechanisms of Emotion-Cognition Interactions in AgingK02AG032309 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2009 to 2013
$540k
Stereotype threat in older adultsR01AG046464 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BARBER, SARAH J, MATHER, MARA · 2014 to 2015
$486k
NIA NIH HHS K02 AG032309NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025340NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038043NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046464NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a group of people working together recalls more items than any one individual, they recall fewer unique items than the same number of people working apart whose responses are combined. This is known as collaborative inhibition, and it is a robust effect that occurs for both younger and older adults. However, almost all previous studies documenting collaborative inhibition have used stimuli that were neutral in emotional valence, low in arousal, and studied by all group members. In the current experiments, we tested the impact of picture-stimuli valence, picture-stimuli arousal, and information distribution in modulating the magnitude of collaborative inhibition. We included both younger and older adults because there are age differences in how people remember emotional pictures that could modulate any effects of emotion on collaborative inhibition. Results revealed that when information was shared (i.e., studied by all group members), there were robust collaborative inhibition effects for both neutral and emotional stimuli for both younger and older adults. However, when information was unshared (i.e., studied by only a single group member), these effects were attenuated. Together, these results provide mixed support for the retrieval strategy disruption account of collaborative inhibition. Supporting the retrieval strategy disruption account, unshared study information was less susceptible to collaborative inhibition than shared study information. Contradicting the retrieval strategy disruption account, emotional valence and arousal did not modulate the magnitude of collaborative inhibition despite the fact that participants clustered the emotional, but not neutral, information together in memory.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, VisualYoung AdultAgingCollaborative inhibitionEmotionGroup memory

Identifiers

PMID28224452
PMCPMC5500393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.