ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017
Comparison of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for myocardial revascularization.
Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Computed tomography coronary angiography - past, present and future.Singapore medical journal · 2020Review
- Hybrid imaging and publishing.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Guidelines in review: Comparison of ESC and AHA guidance for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Review
- Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Physiological Ischemic Training Methods in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2019Article
- Guidelines in review: Comparison of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Myocardial perfusion imaging: Lessons learned and work to be done-update.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Review
- The future of nuclear cardiac imaging: Reflection and a vision.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Comparison of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for myocardial revascularization: are the differences clinically relevant? The European perspective.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Article
- The unsaid word.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byThe unsaid word.2017
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2014, the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions published a comprehensive set of recommendations on myocardial revascularization in patients presenting with acute or chronic coronary artery disease. In the United States, pertinent guidance on this topic has been published by the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association and other relevant societies in multiple guideline documents that have been published in recent years. This document brings together European and American recommendations on myocardial revascularization with a focus on the role of cardiac imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.