Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224436›Full record

ArticleJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban2017

Patients 60 years of age and older should have the same chance for heart transplantation or not?

Mahmoud H Alshirbini, Fei Xie, Nian-Guo Dong, Si Chen, Eman Borham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahmoud H AlshirbiniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Fei XieDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Nian-Guo DongDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. dongnianguo@hotmail.com.
Si ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. 3975840@qq.com.
Eman BorhamDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Union Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart transplantation is considered the best treatment modality for advanced heart disease. While old age has conventionally been considered a contraindication for heart transplantation due to the reported adverse effect of advanced age, however donor hearts' shortage continues to stimulate the discussion about the recipient's upper age limit. Our study was based on a retrospective analysis for the results of 52 (18%) patients aged 60 years and older undergoing heart transplantation between May 2008 and December 2015, and these patients were compared with 236 (82%) adult recipients who were younger than 60 years at the time of transplantation and during the same period. In older group, 71% were males with the mean age of 63.38±3.55 years, and in younger group, 83.4% were males with a mean age of 43.72±11.41 years (P=0.27). Dilated cardiomyopathy was the most common indication for transplantation among patients in both groups (P=0.147). In older group, the 3-month survival rate was higher than that in younger group (P=0.587), however the 6-month survival rate showed no significant difference (P=0.225). Although the 1-year survival rate was higher in older group (P=0.56), yet the 3-year survival rate between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference (P=0.48). According to our experience among older heart transplant candidates who were 60 years and older, we believe that advanced age should not be an excluding criterion to cardiac transplantation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsCardiomyopathy, DilatedFemaleHeart TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateTissue DonorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultadvanced heart failureelderlyheart transplantationsurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID28224436
OpenAlexW2605736695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.