Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224396›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2017

Sacral Neuromodulation Implant Infection: Risk Factors and Prevention.

Calvin Lee, Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky, Marisa M Clifton, Sandip P Vasavada

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Calvin LeeCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Javier Pizarro-BerdichevskyDepartment of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Q10-1, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Marisa M CliftonDepartment of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Q10-1, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Sandip P VasavadaCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. vasavas@ccf.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Device infection is one of the most common complications of sacral nerve stimulator placement and occurs in approximately 3-10% of cases. Infection is a serious complication, as it often requires complete explantation of the device. Not much is known regarding risk factors for and methods of preventing infection in sacral nerve stimulation. Multiple risk factors have been linked to device infection including prolonged percutaneous testing and choice of preoperative antibiotic. Methods of infection prevention have also been studied recently, including antibiotic-impregnated collage and type of skin preparation. This review will discuss the recent literature identifying risk factors and means of preventing infection in sacral nerve stimulation. Finally, we will outline a protocol we have enacted at our institution which has resulted in an incidence of infection of 1.6%.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDevice RemovalElectric Stimulation TherapyHumansNeurotransmitter AgentsPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsNeurotransmitter AgentsDevice infectionInfectionInfection preventionSacral nerve stimulationSacral neuromodulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.