Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224384›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2017

Swedish prospective multicenter trial evaluating sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer.

Linda Holmstrand Zetterlund, Jan Frisell, Athanasios Zouzos, Rimma Axelsson, Thomas Hatschek, Jana de Boniface, Fuat Celebioglu

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Axillary lymph node management strategies in cN + breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linda Holmstrand ZetterlundDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. linda.holmstrand-zetterlund@sll.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-5945
Jan FrisellDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Athanasios ZouzosDepartment of Radiology, Södersjukhuset, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rimma AxelssonDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Radiography, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas HatschekDepartment of Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Cancer Center Karolinska and Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jana de BonifaceDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fuat CelebiogluDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with clinically node-positive breast cancer planned for neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) may draw advantages from the nodal downstaging effect and reduce the extent of axillary surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) performed after NAST. Since there are concerns about lower sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection and higher false-negative rates (FNR) in this setting, our aim was to define the accuracy of SLNB after NAST.

methodsThis Swedish national multicenter trial prospectively recruited 195 breast cancer patients from ten hospitals with T1-T4d biopsy-proven node-positive disease planned for NAST between October 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015. Clinically node-negative axillary status after NAST was not mandatory. SLNB was always attempted and followed by a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

resultsThe SLN identification rate was 77.9% (152/195) but improved to 80.7% (138/171) with dual mapping. The median number of SLNs was two (range 1-5). A positive SLNB was found in 52% (79/152), almost 66% (52/79) of whom had additional positive non-sentinel lymph nodes. The overall pathologic nodal response rate was 33.3% (66/195). The overall FNR was 14.1% (13/92) but decreased to 4% (2/50) when only patients with two or more sentinel nodes were analyzed.

conclusionsIn biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer, SLNB after NAST is feasible even though the identification rate is lower than in clinically node-negative patients. Since the overall FNR is unacceptably high, the omission of ALND should only be considered if two or more SLNs are identified.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnthracyclinesAromatase InhibitorsAxillaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAnthracyclinesAromatase InhibitorsTaxoidsBreast cancerFalse-negative rateIdentification rateNeoadjuvant systemic therapyNode-positiveSentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID28224384
PMCPMC5387036
OpenAlexW2591292056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.