ArticleInternational ophthalmology2018
Conjunctival cytologic features in patients with unilateral primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the cytologic features of conjunctival epithelium in patients with unilateral primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) using impression cytology.
methodsTwenty-four patients with unilateral PANDO for at least 1 year were enrolled in this study. The healthy eyes of the patients are assessed as control group. All patients were subjected to ophthalmic surface examination with conjunctival impression cytology analysis. Squamous metaplasia and goblet cell density were graded according to Nelson grading system.
resultsThe mean age was 52.7 ± 16.3 (range 21-70) years. The mean period for complaints of epiphora was 3.2 ± 2.4 (range 1-8) years. The eye with PANDO had a mean squamous metaplasia grade of 2.38 ± 0.59 versus 1.91 ± 0.82 for control eyes (p = 0.011). The mean grade of goblet cell density was 2.0 ± 0.51 for eyes with PANDO and 2.38 ± 0.65 for control eyes (p = 0.013). There was no statistically significant correlation between conjunctival cytological features in terms of squamous metaplasia and goblet cell density grades and duration of epiphora complaint (r = -0.04, p = 0.82; r = 0.09, p = 0.66, respectively).
conclusionsPANDO may cause alterations in conjunctival impression cytology. Successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgeries will help to protect ocular surface health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28224303What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.