Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224250›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2017

Abscisic acid, sucrose, and auxin coordinately regulate berry ripening process of the Fujiminori grape.

Haifeng Jia, Zhenqiang Xie, Chen Wang, Lingfei Shangguan, Ning Qian, Mengjie Cui, Zhongjie Liu, Ting Zheng, Mengqi Wang, Jinggui Fang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haifeng JiaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China. Jiahaifeng@njau.edu.cn.
Zhenqiang XieKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Chen WangKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Lingfei ShangguanKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Ning QianKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Mengjie CuiKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Zhongjie LiuKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Ting ZhengKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Mengqi WangKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Jinggui FangKey Laboratory of Genetics and Fruit development, Horticultural College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China. Fanggg@njau.edu.cn.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of abscisic acid (ABA), sucrose, and auxin on grape fruit development and to assess the mechanism of these three factors on the grape fruit ripening process. Different concentrations of ABA, sucrose, and auxin were used to treat the grape fruit, and the ripening-related indices, such as physiological and molecular level parameters, were analyzed. The activity of BG protein activity was analyzed during the fruit development. Sucrose, ABA, and auxin influenced the grape fruit sugar accumulation in different ways, as well as the volatile compounds, anthocyanin content, and fruit firmness. ABA and sucrose induced, but auxin blocked, the ripening-related gene expression levels, such as softening genes PE, PG, PL, and CELL, anthocyanin genes DFR, CHI, F3H, GST, CHS, and UFGT, and aroma genes Ecar, QR, and EGS. ABA, sucrose, and glucose induced the fruit dry weight accumulation, and auxin mainly enhanced fruit dry weight through seed weight accumulation. In the early development of grape, starch was the main energy storage; in the later, it was glucose and fructose. Sucrose metabolism pathway-related gene expression levels were significant for glucose and fructose accumulation. BG protein activity was important in the regulation of grape ABA content levels. ABA plays a core role in the grape fruit development; sucrose functions in fruit development through two pathways: one was ABA dependent, the other ABA independent. Auxin blocked ABA accumulation to regulate the fruit development process.

Indexed as

Abscisic AcidFruitIndoleacetic AcidsPlant DevelopmentPlant ProteinsSucroseVitisAbscisic AcidIndoleacetic AcidsPlant ProteinsSucroseABAGrape berry ripeningIAASucroseβ-Glucosidase

Identifiers

PMID28224250
OpenAlexW2590751291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.