ArticleApplications in plant sciences2017
Evaluation and comparison of FTA card and CTAB DNA extraction methods for non-agricultural taxa.
Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of Novel Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cloning and functional characterization of the peptide deformylase encoding gene EuPDF1B from Eucommia ulmoides Oliv.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Functional Characterization of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Characterization of Virus-Inducible Orchid Argonaute 5b Promoter and Its Functional Characterization inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- DNA testing for sickle cell anemia in Africa: Implementation choices for the Democratic Republic of Congo.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- DNA Profiling in Forensic Science: A Review.Global medical genetics · 2021Review
- Marker-Assisted Selection for Pollen-Free Somatic Plants of Sugi (Japanese Cedar,Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Using acetone for rapid PCR-amplifiable DNA extraction from recalcitrant woody plant taxa.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- DNA Adsorption Studies of Poly(4,4'-Cychlohexylidene Bisphenol Oxalate)/Silica Nanocomposites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Generating DNA sequence data with limited resources for molecular biology: Lessons from a barcoding project in Indonesia.Applications in plant sciences · 2018Review
- Cloning and Functional Analysis of Phosphoethanolamine Methyltransferase Promoter from Maize (Zea mays L.).International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Current Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods and Their Implications to Point-of-Care Diagnostics.BioMed research international · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
premise of the studyAn efficient, effective DNA extraction method is necessary for comprehensive analysis of plant genomes. This study analyzed the quality of DNA obtained using paper FTA cards prepared directly in the field when compared to the more traditional cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based extraction methods from silica-dried samples.
methodsDNA was extracted using FTA cards according to the manufacturer's protocol. In parallel, CTAB-based extractions were done using the automated AutoGen DNA isolation system. DNA quality for both methods was determined for 15 non-agricultural species collected in situ, by gel separation, spectrophotometry, fluorometry, and successful amplification and sequencing of nuclear and chloroplast gene markers.
resultsThe FTA card extraction method yielded less concentrated, but also less fragmented samples than the CTAB-based technique. The card-extracted samples provided DNA that could be successfully amplified and sequenced. The FTA cards are also useful because the collected samples do not require refrigeration, extensive laboratory expertise, or as many hazardous chemicals as extractions using the CTAB-based technique. DISCUSSION: The relative success of the FTA card method in our study suggested that this method could be a valuable tool for studies in plant population genetics and conservation biology that may involve screening of hundreds of individual plants. The FTA cards, like the silica gel samples, do not contain plant material capable of propagation, and therefore do not require permits from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) for transportation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.