ArticlePeerJ2017
Variant profiling of evolving prokaryotic populations.
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-accuracy SNV calling for bacterial isolates using deep learning with AccuSNV.Genome research · 2026Article
- Antibiotic resistance increases evolvability and maximizes opportunities across fitness landscapes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- High-accuracy SNV calling for bacterial isolates using deep learning with AccuSNV.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Succinate utilisation by Salmonella is inhibited by multiple regulatory systems.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- DeepCorr: a novel error correction method for 3GS long reads based on deep learning.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Genome Dynamics and Temperature Adaptation During Experimental Evolution of Obligate Intracellular Bacteria.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Alterations of oral microbiota and impact on the gut microbiome in type 1 diabetes mellitus revealed by integrated multi-omic analyses.Microbiome · 2022Article
- Understanding the Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Metagenome SNP calling via read-colored de Bruijn graphs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Molecular causes of an evolutionary shift along the parasitism-mutualism continuum in a bacterial symbiont.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Review
- Current and Promising Approaches to Identify Horizontal Gene Transfer Events in Metagenomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Review
- Within-Host Genomic Diversity of Candida albicans in Healthy Carriers.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Genome-wide detection of conservative site-specific recombination in bacteria.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic heterogeneity of bacterial species is observed and studied in experimental evolution experiments and clinical diagnostics, and occurs as micro-diversity of natural habitats. The challenge for genome research is to accurately capture this heterogeneity with the currently used short sequencing reads. Recent advances in NGS technologies improved the speed and coverage and thus allowed for deep sequencing of bacterial populations. This facilitates the quantitative assessment of genomic heterogeneity, including low frequency alleles or haplotypes. However, false positive variant predictions due to sequencing errors and mapping artifacts of short reads need to be prevented. We therefore created VarCap, a workflow for the reliable prediction of different types of variants even at low frequencies. In order to predict SNPs, InDels and structural variations, we evaluated the sensitivity and accuracy of different software tools using synthetic read data. The results suggested that the best sensitivity could be reached by a union of different tools, however at the price of increased false positives. We identified possible reasons for false predictions and used this knowledge to improve the accuracy by post-filtering the predicted variants according to properties such as frequency, coverage, genomic environment/localization and co-localization with other variants. We observed that best precision was achieved by using an intersection of at least two tools per variant. This resulted in the reliable prediction of variants above a minimum relative abundance of 2%. VarCap is designed for being routinely used within experimental evolution experiments or for clinical diagnostics. The detected variants are reported as frequencies within a VCF file and as a graphical overview of the distribution of the different variant/allele/haplotype frequencies. The source code of VarCap is available at https://github.com/ma2o/VarCap. In order to provide this workflow to a broad community, we implemeted VarCap on a Galaxy webserver, which is accessible at http://galaxy.csb.univie.ac.at.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.