Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28224048›Full record

ArticleAdvances in wound care2017

Wound Penetration of Cefazolin, Ciprofloxacin, Piperacillin, Tazobactam, and Vancomycin During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Matthew P Rowan, Krista L Niece, Julie A Rizzo, Kevin S Akers

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in wound care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06506032 (Clinical Effect and Wound Penetration of Vancomycin in Open-heart Surgery Patients Receiving Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Deep Sternal Wound Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06506032 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Effect and Wound Penetration of Vancomycin in Open-heart Surgery Patients Receiving Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Deep Sternal Wound Infection

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled10ConditionsPost-Sternotomy Deep Sternal Wound InfectionArmsIntravenous Vancomycin administration, Standard postoperative therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew P RowanUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research , JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Krista L NieceUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research , JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Julie A RizzoUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kevin S AkersUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.; Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

antibioticburnexudatepharmacokineticstraumaWoundVac

Identifiers

PMID28224048
PMCPMC5286546
OpenAlexW2565005600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.