Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28223980›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Assessment of Ruminal Bacterial and Archaeal Community Structure in Yak (

Zhenming Zhou, Lei Fang, Qingxiang Meng, Shengli Li, Shatuo Chai, Shujie Liu, Jan Thomas Schonewille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding the Diversity and Roles of the Ruminal Microbiome.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhenming ZhouState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Lei FangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Qingxiang MengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Shengli LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Shatuo ChaiQinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University Xining, China.
Shujie LiuQinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University Xining, China.
Jan Thomas SchonewilleDepartment of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the microbial community composition in the rumen of yaks under different feeding regimes. Microbial communities were assessed by sequencing bacterial and archaeal 16S ribosomal RNA gene fragments obtained from yaks (

Indexed as

feeding regimesruminal archaeal community structuresruminal bacterial community structuresequencingyak

Identifiers

PMID28223980
PMCPMC5293774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.