ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017
Enhanced Corticospinal Excitability and Volitional Drive in Response to Shortening and Lengthening Strength Training and Changes Following Detraining.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Corticospinal and spinal adaptations following lower limb motor skill training: a meta-analysis with best evidence synthesis.Experimental brain research · 2023Pooled it
- Can the cross-education of strength attenuate the impact of detraining after a period of strength training? A quasi-randomized trial.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Trial
- Including the Eccentric Phase in Resistance Training to Counteract the Effects of Detraining in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of strength and conditioning research · 2022Trial
- Insights into the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and motor imagery in a training-based approach.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Trial
- Strength gains and absence of hypertrophy and cross-education in knee extensors following short-term low-volume eccentric training in untrained young men.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Effective number of maximal eccentric contractions in the early phase of twice-weekly training to increase muscle strength and thickness of the elbow flexors in untrained young adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Corticospinal drive modulation to agonist and antagonist arm muscles following strength training and detraining.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked responses and silent periods during explosive voluntary isometric contractions.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
- Test-retest reliability of cortico-spinal measurements in the rectus femoris at different contraction levels.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Does the reticulospinal tract mediate adaptation to resistance training in humans?Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2022Review
- The Central Mechanisms of Resistance Training and Its Effects on Cognitive Function.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Review
- Corticospinal and spinal adaptations to motor skill and resistance training: Potential mechanisms and implications for motor rehabilitation and athletic development.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Review
- Strength and Power Training in Rehabilitation: Underpinning Principles and Practical Strategies to Return Athletes to High Performance.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Review
- Three Weeks of Detraining Does Not Decrease Muscle Thickness, Strength or Sport Performance in Adolescent Athletes.International journal of exercise science · 2020Article
- Global Corticospinal Excitability as Assessed in A Non-Exercised Upper Limb Muscle Compared Between Concentric and Eccentric Modes of Leg Cycling.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Corrigendum to "Spinal and supraspinal control of motor function during maximal eccentric muscle contraction: Effects of resistance training" [J Sport Health Sci 7 (2018) 282-293].Journal of sport and health science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a limited understanding of the neurological adaptations responsible for changes in strength following shortening and lengthening resistance training and subsequent detraining. The aim of the study was to investigate differences in corticospinal and spinal responses to resistance training of the tibialis anterior muscle between shortening or lengthening muscle contractions for 4 weeks and after 2 weeks of detraining. Thirty-one untrained individuals were assigned to either shortening or lengthening isokinetic resistance training (4 weeks, 3 days/weeks) or a non-training control group. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) were used to assess corticospinal and spinal changes, respectively, at pre-, mid-, post-resistance training and post detraining. Greater increases changes (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.