Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28223527›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and Bronze Age Eurasian migrations.

Amy Goldberg, Torsten Günther, Noah A Rosenberg, Mattias Jakobsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Male-driven admixture facilitated subsistence shift in northern China.Anthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Human genetic admixture through the lens of population genomics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fitness and Power: The Contribution of Genetics to the History of Differential Reproduction.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amy GoldbergDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; mattias.jakobsson@ebc.uu.se agoldb@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9306-1539
Torsten GüntherDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-390X
Noah A RosenbergDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Mattias JakobssonDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; mattias.jakobsson@ebc.uu.se agoldb@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dramatic events in human prehistory, such as the spread of agriculture to Europe from Anatolia and the late Neolithic/Bronze Age migration from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, can be investigated using patterns of genetic variation among the people who lived in those times. In particular, studies of differing female and male demographic histories on the basis of ancient genomes can provide information about complexities of social structures and cultural interactions in prehistoric populations. We use a mechanistic admixture model to compare the sex-specifically-inherited X chromosome with the autosomes in 20 early Neolithic and 16 late Neolithic/Bronze Age human remains. Contrary to previous hypotheses suggested by the patrilocality of many agricultural populations, we find no evidence of sex-biased admixture during the migration that spread farming across Europe during the early Neolithic. For later migrations from the Pontic Steppe during the late Neolithic/Bronze Age, however, we estimate a dramatic male bias, with approximately five to 14 migrating males for every migrating female. We find evidence of ongoing, primarily male, migration from the steppe to central Europe over a period of multiple generations, with a level of sex bias that excludes a pulse migration during a single generation. The contrasting patterns of sex-specific migration during these two migrations suggest a view of differing cultural histories in which the Neolithic transition was driven by mass migration of both males and females in roughly equal numbers, perhaps whole families, whereas the later Bronze Age migration and cultural shift were instead driven by male migration, potentially connected to new technology and conquest.

Indexed as

History, AncientBody RemainsChromosomes, Human, XDNA, MitochondrialEuropeFemaleHuman MigrationHumansMaleSexismDNA, MitochondrialadmixturemigrationNeolithicsex biasX chromosome

Identifiers

PMID28223527
PMCPMC5347611
OpenAlexW2590715639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.