Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28223290›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2017

Nephrologists' Perspectives on Defining and Applying Patient-Centered Outcomes in Hemodialysis.

Allison Tong, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, David C Wheeler, Wim van Biesen, Peter Tugwell, Braden Manns, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Tess Harris, Sally Crowe, Angela Ju and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predicting Kidney Transplant Evaluation Non-attendance.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Allison TongSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Wolfgang C WinkelmayerSelzman Institute for Kidney Health, Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
David C WheelerCentre for Nephrology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wim van BiesenRenal Division, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter TugwellDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Braden MannsDepartments of Medicine and.
Brenda HemmelgarnDepartments of Medicine and.
Tess HarrisPolycystic Kidney Disease International, London, United Kingdom; and.
Sally CroweCrowe Associates Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Angela JuSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emma O'LoneSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole EvangelidisSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jonathan C CraigSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
SONG-HD Initiative
University of Sydney · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUUniversity of Calgary · CABaylor College of Medicine · USGhent University Hospital · BEKidney Care UK · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPatient centeredness is widely advocated as a cornerstone of health care, but it is yet to be fully realized, including in nephrology. Our study aims to describe nephrologists' perspectives on defining and implementing patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted with 58 nephrologists from 27 dialysis units across nine countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Singapore, and New Zealand. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.

resultsWe identified five themes on defining and implementing patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis: explicitly prioritized by patients (articulated preferences and goals, ascertaining treatment burden, defining hemodialysis success, distinguishing a physician-patient dichotomy, and supporting shared decision making), optimizing wellbeing (respecting patient choice, focusing on symptomology, perceptible and tangible, and judging relevance and consequence), comprehending extensive heterogeneity of clinical and quality of life outcomes (distilling diverse priorities, highly individualized, attempting to specify outcomes, and broadening context), clinically hamstrung (professional deficiency, uncertainty and complexity in measurement, beyond medical purview, specificity of care, mechanistic mindset [focused on biochemical targets and comorbidities], avoiding alarm, and paradoxical dilemma), and undermined by system pressures (adhering to overarching policies, misalignment with mandates, and resource constraints).

conclusionsImproving patient-centered outcomes is regarded by nephrologists to encompass strategies that address patient goals and improve wellbeing and treatment burden in patients on hemodialysis. However, efforts are hampered by ambiguities about how to prioritize, measure, and manage the plethora of critical comorbidities and broader quality of life outcomes in a care setting that is technically demanding and driven by biochemical targets. Identifying critical patient-important outcomes and mechanisms for integrating them into practice may help to deliver patient-centered care in hemodialysis and other chronic disease settings.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNephrologyPatient Outcome AssessmentRenal DialysisAdultAgedClinical CompetenceFemaleHealth ResourcesHealth StatusHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care PlanningPatient ParticipationAustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChronic DiseaseComorbidityDecision MakingGermanyGoalsGreat BritainhemodialysisHumansnephrologyNew ZealandPatient-Centered CarePatient SelectionPhysician-Patient Relationsqualitative researchquality of liferenal dialysisSingaporeUncertaintyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28223290
PMCPMC5338715
OpenAlexW2588335470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.