ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2017
Nephrologists' Perspectives on Defining and Applying Patient-Centered Outcomes in Hemodialysis.
Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carnitine supplements for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Beyond observed changes: how differential item functioning and response shift alter health-related quality of life interpretation in preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplant patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis: Findings from a matched cohort study.The journal of vascular access · 2026Article
- Improving quality of life in older dialysis patients: the case for broader functional assessment.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- In search of common ground - nephrologists' experiences in preparing and informing patients on the path to end-stage kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Symptom Burden in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: Prevalence and Severity 17 Years Apart.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Predicting Kidney Transplant Evaluation Non-attendance.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2024Article
- Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study.BMJ open · 2023Review
- Different Perspectives of Spanish Patients and Professionals on How a Dialysis Unit Should Be Designed.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Article
- Shared decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice.Kidney international · 2021Review
- Article
- Patient perspectives of target weight management and ultrafiltration in haemodialysis: a multi-center survey.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
- Nephrologists' experiences with patient participation when long-term dialysis is required.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
- Voicing Individual Concerns for Engagement in Hemodialysis (VOICE-HD): A Mixed Method, Randomized Pilot Trial of Digital Health in Dialysis Care Delivery.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2021Article
- Patient Partner Perspectives Regarding Ethically and Clinically Important Aspects of Trial Design in Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials for Hemodialysis.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2021Article
- Feasibility of Tablet-Based Patient-Reported Symptom Data Collection Among Hemodialysis Patients.Kidney international reports · 2020Article
- An Environmental Scan of Canadian Quality Metrics for Patients on In-Center Hemodialysis.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Article
- Ethical Issues in the Design and Conduct of Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials in Hemodialysis Care: An Interview Study With Key Stakeholders.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPatient centeredness is widely advocated as a cornerstone of health care, but it is yet to be fully realized, including in nephrology. Our study aims to describe nephrologists' perspectives on defining and implementing patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted with 58 nephrologists from 27 dialysis units across nine countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Singapore, and New Zealand. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.
resultsWe identified five themes on defining and implementing patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis: explicitly prioritized by patients (articulated preferences and goals, ascertaining treatment burden, defining hemodialysis success, distinguishing a physician-patient dichotomy, and supporting shared decision making), optimizing wellbeing (respecting patient choice, focusing on symptomology, perceptible and tangible, and judging relevance and consequence), comprehending extensive heterogeneity of clinical and quality of life outcomes (distilling diverse priorities, highly individualized, attempting to specify outcomes, and broadening context), clinically hamstrung (professional deficiency, uncertainty and complexity in measurement, beyond medical purview, specificity of care, mechanistic mindset [focused on biochemical targets and comorbidities], avoiding alarm, and paradoxical dilemma), and undermined by system pressures (adhering to overarching policies, misalignment with mandates, and resource constraints).
conclusionsImproving patient-centered outcomes is regarded by nephrologists to encompass strategies that address patient goals and improve wellbeing and treatment burden in patients on hemodialysis. However, efforts are hampered by ambiguities about how to prioritize, measure, and manage the plethora of critical comorbidities and broader quality of life outcomes in a care setting that is technically demanding and driven by biochemical targets. Identifying critical patient-important outcomes and mechanisms for integrating them into practice may help to deliver patient-centered care in hemodialysis and other chronic disease settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.