Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28222818›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2017

Store-directed price promotions and communications strategies improve healthier food supply and demand: impact results from a randomized controlled, Baltimore City store-intervention trial.

Nadine Budd, Jayne K Jeffries, Jessica Jones-Smith, Anna Kharmats, Ann Yelmokas McDermott, Joel Gittelsohn

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fruit and Vegetable Purchases in Farmer's Market Stands: Analysing Survey and Sales Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nadine Budd1Division of Nutrition,Physical Activity,and Obesity,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,4770 Buford Highway,Mailstop F-77,Atlanta,GA 30341,USA.
Jayne K Jeffries2The Gillings School of Global Public Health,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill,NC,USA.
Jessica Jones-Smith3Department of Health Services & Nutrition Sciences Program,University of Washington,Seattle,WA,USA.
Anna Kharmats4The Global Obesity Prevention Center,Bloomberg School of Public Health,Johns Hopkins University,Baltimore,MD,USA.
Ann Yelmokas McDermott4The Global Obesity Prevention Center,Bloomberg School of Public Health,Johns Hopkins University,Baltimore,MD,USA.
Joel Gittelsohn4The Global Obesity Prevention Center,Bloomberg School of Public Health,Johns Hopkins University,Baltimore,MD,USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

MULTILEVEL SYSTEMS-ORIENTED CHILDHOOD OBESITY STUDY IN CHINAU54HD070725 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, BRUCE Y · 2011 to 2016
$15.9M
Multilevel Communications and access strategies to improve the food environmentR21HL102812 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GITTELSOHN, JOEL · 2011 to 2012
$451k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL102812NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD070725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSmall food store interventions show promise to increase healthy food access in under-resourced areas. However, none have tested the impact of price discounts on healthy food supply and demand. We tested the impact of store-directed price discounts and communications strategies, separately and combined, on the stocking, sales and prices of healthier foods and on storeowner psychosocial factors.

designFactorial design randomized controlled trial.

settingTwenty-four corner stores in low-income neighbourhoods of Baltimore City, MD, USA. SUBJECTS: Stores were randomized to pricing intervention, communications intervention, combined pricing and communications intervention, or control. Stores that received the pricing intervention were given a 10-30 % price discount by wholesalers on selected healthier food items during the 6-month trial. Communications stores received visual and interactive materials to promote healthy items, including signage, taste tests and refrigerators.

resultsAll interventions showed significantly increased stock of promoted foods v. CONTROL: There was a significant treatment effect for daily unit sales of healthy snacks (β=6·4, 95 % CI 0·9, 11·9) and prices of healthy staple foods (β=-0·49, 95 % CI -0·90, -0·03) for the combined group v. control, but not for other intervention groups. There were no significant intervention effects on storeowner psychosocial factors.

conclusionsAll interventions led to increased stock of healthier foods. The combined intervention was effective in increasing sales of healthier snacks, even though discounts on snacks were not passed to the consumer. Experimental research in small stores is needed to understand the mechanisms by which store-directed price promotions can increase healthy food supply and demand.

Indexed as

CommunicationBaltimoreCommerceConsumer BehaviorCosts and Cost AnalysisDiet, HealthyFemaleFood AssistanceFood SupplyHumansMaleResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsFood access interventionsFood storesObesityPricing interventionsTrade promotions

Identifiers

PMID28222818
PMCPMC5725746
OpenAlexW2589258708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.