Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28222751›Full record

Observational studyImplementation science : IS2017

Planning to be routine: habit as a mediator of the planning-behaviour relationship in healthcare professionals.

Sebastian Potthoff, Justin Presseau, Falko F Sniehotta, Marie Johnston, Marko Elovainio, Leah Avery

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Habit Formation to Enhance Implementation of Evidence-based Practice.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026
    Review
  10. From Habit to Justification: A Dual Process Theory Approach to Primary Care Bypassing in China.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sebastian PotthoffInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. sebastian.potthoff@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4580-8532
Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Falko F SniehottaInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Marie JohnstonInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Marko ElovainioUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Leah AveryInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGaps in the quality of care provided to people with type 2 diabetes are regularly identified. Healthcare professionals often have a strong intention to follow practice guidelines during consultations with people with type 2 diabetes; however, this intention does not always translate into action. Action planning (planning when, where and how to act) and coping planning (planning how to overcome pre-identified barriers) have been hypothesised to help with the enactment of intentions by creating mental cue-response links that promote habit formation. This study aimed to investigate whether habit helps to better understand how action and coping planning relate to clinical behaviour in the context of type 2 diabetes care.

methodsThe study utilised a prospective correlational design with six nested sub-studies. General practitioners and practice nurses (n = 427 from 99 UK primary care practices) completed measures of action planning, coping planning and habit at baseline and then self-reported their enactment of guideline-recommended advising, prescribing and examining behaviours 12 months later. Bootstrapped mediation analyses were used to test the indirect effect of action and coping planning on healthcare professionals' clinical behaviour via their relationship with habit.

resultsHealthcare professionals who reported higher degrees of action or coping planning for performing six guideline recommended behaviours in the context of type 2 diabetes care were more likely to report performing these behaviours in clinical practice. All 12 bootstrapped mediation analyses showed that the positive relationship between planning (action and coping planning) and healthcare professionals' clinical behaviour operated indirectly through habit.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that habit mediates the relationship between planning (action and coping planning) and healthcare professional behaviour. Promoting careful action and coping planning may support routinised uptake of guideline-recommended care by healthcare professionals in the primary care setting. Given the competing demands on healthcare professionals, exploring the behavioural processes involved in promoting more routinisation of behaviours where possible and appropriate could free up cognitive capacity for clinical behaviours that rely on more deliberation.

Indexed as

HabitsPatient Care PlanningDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansIntentionMalePractice Patterns, Nurses'Practice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesQuality of Health CareAction planningAutomaticityCoping planningHabitHealthcare professionalsImplementation intentionsIntentionPrimary careType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28222751
PMCPMC5319033
OpenAlexW2589391013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.