Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28222746›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2017

C-terminal region of apoptin affects chicken anemia virus replication and virulence.

Yongqiang Wang, Xiuqing Song, Honglei Gao, Xiaoyan Wang, Yonghao Hu, Yulong Gao, Xiaole Qi, Liting Qin, Huan Lin, Li Gao and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yongqiang WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiuqing SongState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Honglei GaoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyan WangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Yonghao HuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yulong GaoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Xiaole QiState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Liting QinState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Huan LinState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Li GaoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Shuai YaoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Chunyan HanState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Xiaomei WangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Hualan ChenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. hlchen1@yahoo.com.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHarbin Veterinary Research Institute · CNGansu Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChicken anemia virus (CAV) causes anemia and immune suppression, which are important diseases in the poultry industry. CAV VP3, also referred as 'apoptin', has been shown to selectively kill tumor cells, raising great hopes for its utilization as an anticancer therapy. The ability of apoptin to induce apoptosis is closely related to its nuclear localization. The C-terminal region of apoptin contains a bipartite nuclear localization signals (NLS), and a nuclear export signal (NES) is located between the arms of the NLS. Most previous studies have expressed apoptin of different lengths in vitro to understand the relationship between its localization and its induction of apoptosis.

methodsIn this study, we investigated the replication of CAV and its induction of apoptosis in vitro and in vivo with VP3-truncated infectious virus. Quantitative PCR was used to detect viral replication in MDCC-MSB1 cells, and the viral localization was observed by confocal microscopy. Flow cytometry was uesed to analyze virus-induced apoptosis in MDCC-MSB1 cells. Additionally, chickens infected with the rescued viruses compared with the parental virus rM9905 to evaluate the viral replication in vivo and virulence.

resultsBased on the infectious clone, we rescued two viruses in which were deleted NES-NLS2 (rCAV-VP3N88) or NLS1-NES-NLS2 (rCAV-VP3N80) in the C-terminal region of apoptin. The viral load of rCAV-VP3N88 decreased significantly between 60 and 108 hpi, and was always 10-100-fold lower than that of the parental virus rM9905. The levels of rCAV-VP3N80 were also 10-100-fold lower than that of rM9905 and declined significantly at three time points. There was almost no difference in the viral loads of rCAV-VP3N88 and rCAV-VP3N80. Additionally, rM9905 induced 85.39 ± 2.18% apoptosis at 96 hpi, whereas rCAV-VP3N88 and rCAV-VP3N80 induced 63.08 ± 4.78% and 62.56 ± 7.35% apoptosis, respectively, which were significantly (about 20%) lower than that induced by the parental virus. The rescued viruses altered the nuclear localization in MDCC-MSB1 cells. Moreover, deletion of C-terminal region of apoptin impaired viral replication in vivo and reduced the virulence of CAV in chickens.

conclusionsIn summary, we have demonstrated that the C-terminal deletion of apoptin in infectious CAV affected the replication of the virus. The deletion of the C-terminal region of apoptin not only significantly reduced viral replication in vitro but also reduced its induction of apoptosis, which correlated with the loss of its nuclear localization. The deletion of the C-terminal region of apoptin also impaired the replication of CAV and attenuated its virulence in chickens.

Indexed as

ApoptosisVirus ReplicationActive Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsCapsid ProteinsCell LineChicken anemia virusChickensDNA Mutational AnalysisFlow CytometryMicroscopy, ConfocalReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionVirulenceVirulence FactorsCapsid ProteinsVirulence FactorsVP3 protein, Chicken anemia virusApoptinApoptosisChicken anemia virusReplicationVirulence

Identifiers

PMID28222746
PMCPMC5320637
OpenAlexW2590936986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.