ArticleBMC public health2017
A longitudinal study on determinants of HPV vaccination uptake in parents/guardians from different ethnic backgrounds in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Uptake of human papilloma virus vaccine and its determinants among females in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Resources for assessing parents' vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2020Pooled it
- Parents' uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Barriers, facilitators, needs, and preferences in seeking information regarding cervical cancer prevention programs among Turkish, Moroccan, and Syrian immigrant women: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Translation and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess the health beliefs of Pakistani mothers regarding human papillomavirus vaccination.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
- Factors influencing human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among parents and teachers of schoolgirls in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Factors affecting HPV vaccine uptake among ethnic minority adolescent girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Review
- Easy access to vaccination was important for adherence during the 2016-2019 HPV catch-up vaccination in Norway.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Sociodemographic determinants of catch-up HPV vaccination completion between 2016-2019 in Norway.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake: a longitudinal study showing ethnic differences in the influence of the intention-to-vaccinate among parent-daughter dyads.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Vaccination coverage against human papillomavirus (HPV) and associated factors in female academics from a university in southwestern Goiás, Brazil.Revista de saude publica · 2021Article
- Factors associated with HPV vaccination uptake in Uganda: a multi-level analysis.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- Willingness of parents to vaccinate their 6-60-month-old children with EV71 vaccines: a cross-sectional study in rural areas of northern Jiangsu Province.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Clustering of chronic hepatitis B screening intentions in social networks of Moroccan immigrants in the Netherlands.BMC public health · 2020Article
- HPV knowledge and vaccine acceptance among European adolescents and their parents: a systematic literature review.Public health reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage in the Netherlands is low (~60%) compared to other childhood vaccinations (>90%), and even lower among ethnic minorities. The aim of this study was to explore the possible impact of ethnicity on the determinants of both HPV vaccination intention and HPV vaccination uptake among parents/guardians having a daughter that is invited for the HPV vaccination.
methodsIn February 2014, parents/guardians living in Amsterdam were invited to complete a questionnaire about social-psychological determinants of their decision making process regarding the HPV vaccination of their daughter and socio-demographic characteristics. This questionnaire was sent approximately one month before the daughter was scheduled to receive her first HPV vaccine dose. Their daughters' HPV vaccination status was retrieved from the national vaccination database. We distinguished four ethnic groups: Dutch (NL), Surinamese, Netherlands Antillean, and Aruban (SNA), Middle-Eastern and North-African (MENA), and Other. To assess the impact of determinants on both intention and uptake, linear and logistic regression analyses were used respectively. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equation.
resultsIn total 1,309 parents/guardians participated (33% participation rate). In all groups we found the mothers' intention to be the strongest predictor of their daughters' HPV vaccination uptake. Explained variance of uptake was highest in the NL-group (pseudo-R
conclusionWe conclude that the same determinants should be targeted in the different ethnic groups, although the mode of delivery of the intervention needs to be tailored to the different cultural backgrounds. Further research is needed to explain the observed discrepancy between intention and uptake, especially among parents/guardians in the non-Dutch groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.