Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28222688›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2017

Vascular access conversion and patient outcome after hemodialysis initiation with a nonfunctional arteriovenous access: a prospective registry-based study.

Natalia Alencar de Pinho, Raphael Coscas, Marie Metzger, Michel Labeeuw, Carole Ayav, Christian Jacquelinet, Ziad A Massy, Bénédicte Stengel, French REIN registry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Are There Differences in Arteriovenous Fistulae Created for Hemodialysis between Nephrologists and Vascular Surgeons?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natalia Alencar de PinhoParis Saclay University, Paris-Sud Univ, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Renal and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France. natalia.alencar-de-pinho@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0438-6487
Raphael CoscasParis Saclay University, Paris-Sud Univ, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Renal and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France.
Marie MetzgerParis Saclay University, Paris-Sud Univ, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Renal and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France.
Michel LabeeuwLyon-Sud University Hospital, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Carole AyavCHRU Nancy, Pôle S2R, Epidémiologie et Evaluations Cliniques, Nancy, France.
Christian JacquelinetBiomedicine Agency, Saint Denis, France.
Ziad A MassyParis Saclay University, Paris-Sud Univ, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Renal and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France.
Bénédicte StengelParis Saclay University, Paris-Sud Univ, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Renal and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France.
French REIN registry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about vascular access conversion and outcomes for patients starting hemodialysis with nonfunctional arteriovenous (AV) access. We assessed mortality risk associated with nonfunctional AV access at hemodialysis initiation, taking subsequent changes in vascular access into account.

methodsWe studied the 53,092 incident adult hemodialysis patients included in the French REIN registry from 2005 through 2012. AV access placed predialysis was considered nonfunctional when dialysis began with a central venous catheter. Information about vascular access changes was obtained from treatment modality updates.

resultsAt hemodialysis initiation, AV access was functional for 47% of patients and nonfunctional for 9%; 44% had a catheter alone. After a 3-year follow-up, 63% of patients beginning hemodialysis with a nonfunctional AV access had changed to a functional one, 4% had had a transplant, 19% had died before any vascular access change, and 13% still used a catheter. Cox proportional hazard models with vascular access treated as a time-dependent variable showed an adjusted mortality hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for patients with nonfunctional AV access who subsequently converted to functional access of 0.95 (95% CI 0.89-1.03) compared with the reference group with functional AV access since first hemodialysis, versus 1.43 (95% CI 1.31-1.55) for those who did not convert.

conclusionsAmong patients starting hemodialysis with a nonfunctional AV access, a substantial percentage may never experience successful vascular access conversion. Poor survival seems to be limited to these patients, while those who subsequently convert to functional AV access have similar mortality risk compared to patients with such access since hemodialysis initiation. Every effort should be made to obtain functional AV access in all suitable patients.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalCatheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersRegistriesAgedFemaleFranceHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedMortalityPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRenal DialysisArteriovenous fistulaCatheterChronic hemodialysisEpidemiologyVascular access

Identifiers

PMID28222688
PMCPMC5320699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.