ArticleStatistics in medicine2017
Selecting cases and controls for DNA sequencing studies using family histories of disease.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent improvements in sequencing technology have enabled the investigation of so-called missing heritability, and a large number of affected subjects have been sequenced in order to detect significant associations between human diseases and rare variants. However, the cost of genome sequencing is still high, and a statistically powerful strategy for selecting informative subjects would be useful. Therefore, in this report, we propose a new statistical method for selecting cases and controls for sequencing studies based on family history. We assume that disease status is determined by unobserved liability scores. Our method consists of two steps: first, the conditional means of liability are estimated with the liability threshold model given the individual's disease status and those of their relatives. Second, the informative subjects are selected with the estimated conditional means. Our simulation studies showed that statistical power is substantially affected by the subject selection strategy chosen, and power is maximized when affected (unaffected) subjects with high (low) risks are selected as cases (controls). The proposed method was successfully applied to genome-wide association studies for type 2 diabetes, and our analysis results reveal the practical value of the proposed methods. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.