Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28222169›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Decellularized Wharton's Jelly from human umbilical cord as a novel 3D scaffolding material for tissue engineering applications.

Sushma Jadalannagari, Gabriel Converse, Christopher McFall, Eric Buse, Michael Filla, Maria T Villar, Antonio Artigues, Adam J Mellot, Jinxi Wang, Michael S Detamore and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Enhancing the maturity ofRegenerative biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sushma JadalannagariDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Gabriel ConverseDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Christopher McFallCardiac Regenerative Surgery Research Laboratories, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Eric BuseCardiac Regenerative Surgery Research Laboratories, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Michael FillaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Maria T VillarDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Antonio ArtiguesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Adam J MellotDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Jinxi WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Michael S DetamoreDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Richard A HopkinsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Omar S AljitawiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Novel Approaches for the Control of Microbial PathogensP30GM103326 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI YANKEE, THOMAS M. · 2012 to 2016
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In tissue engineering, an ideal scaffold attracts and supports cells thus providing them with the necessary mechanical support and architecture as they reconstruct new tissue in vitro and in vivo. This manuscript details a novel matrix derived from decellularized Wharton's jelly (WJ) obtained from human umbilical cord for use as a scaffold for tissue engineering application. This decellularized Wharton's jelly matrix (DWJM) contained 0.66 ± 0.12 μg/mg sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and was abundant in hyaluronic acid, and completely devoid of cells. Mass spectroscopy revealed the presence of collagen types II, VI and XII, fibronectin-I, and lumican I. When seeded onto DWJM, WJ mesenchymal stem cells (WJMSCs), successfully attached to, and penetrated the porous matrix resulting in a slower rate of cell proliferation. Gene expression analysis of WJ and bone marrow (BM) MSCs cultured on DWJM demonstrated decreased expression of proliferation genes with no clear pattern of differentiation. When this matrix was implanted into a murine calvarial defect model with, green fluorescent protein (GFP) labeled osteocytes, the osteocytes were observed to migrate into the matrix as early as 24 hours. They were also identified in the matrix up to 14 days after transplantation. Together with these findings, we conclude that DWJM can be used as a 3D porous, bioactive and biocompatible scaffold for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsDNAGlycosaminoglycansHumansMass SpectrometryMesenchymal Stem CellsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, ElectronTissue EngineeringUmbilical CordWharton JellyDNAGlycosaminoglycans

Identifiers

PMID28222169
PMCPMC5319682
OpenAlexW2591002979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.