SynthesisPloS one2017
A meta-analysis of the abscopal effect in preclinical models: Is the biologically effective dose a relevant physical trigger?
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Non-targeted effects of stereotactic radiotherapy: a review of the evidence coming from the clinical field.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Atezolizumab and stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: safety, clinical activity and ctDNA responses-the ComIT-1 trial.Molecular oncology · 2023Trial
- A Non-interventional Clinical Trial Assessing Immune Responses After Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Trial
- Article
- Precision immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: therapeutic combinations, biomarker strategies, and translational challenges.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Immuno-radiotherapy enhances tumor control and induces abscopal responses in a humanized mouse model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Survival benefits of concurrent immune checkpoint inhibitor and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Phenomenological insights into the FLASH radiotherapy-induced abscopal effect.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Case Report: Abscopal effect in a patient with refractory metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Review
- Pivotal Role of Cranial Irradiation-Induced Peripheral, Intrinsic, and Brain-Engrafting Macrophages in Malignant Glioma.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Review
- Mathematical modeling of the synergistic interplay of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in anti-cancer treatments.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- The Diagnosis and Treatment Approach for Oligo-Recurrent and Oligo-Progressive Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2023Review
- Opportunities and challenges in combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy in esophageal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- A long-term survival case of bladder cancer with distant metastases: abscopal effect of brain metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade therapy to lung metastases.International cancer conference journal · 2023Article
- Peripheral blood lymphocyte changes after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to lung or liver metastases in patients with oligometastatic cancers.Radiation oncology journal · 2023Article
- On target methods to induce abscopal phenomenon for Off-Target effects: From happenstance to happenings.Cancer medicine · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreclinical in vivo studies using small animals are considered crucial in translational cancer research and clinical implementation of novel treatments. This is of paramount relevance in radiobiology, especially for any technological developments permitted to deliver high doses in single or oligo-fractionated regimens, such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). In this context, clinical success in cancer treatment needs to be guaranteed, sparing normal tissue and preventing the potential spread of disease or local recurrence. In this work we introduce a new dose-response relationship based on relevant publications concerning preclinical models with regard to delivered dose, fractionation schedule and occurrence of biological effects on non-irradiated tissue, abscopal effects.
methodsWe reviewed relevant publications on murine models and the abscopal effect in radiation cancer research following PRISMA methodology. In particular, through a log-likelihood method, we evaluated whether the occurrence of abscopal effects may be related to the biologically effective dose (BED). To this aim, studies accomplished with different tumor histotypes were considered in our analysis including breast, colon, lung, fibrosarcoma, pancreas, melanoma and head and neck cancer. For all the tumors, the α / β ratio was assumed to be 10 Gy, as generally adopted for neoplastic cells.
resultsOur results support the hypothesis that the occurrence rate of abscopal effects in preclinical models increases with BED. In particular, the probability of revealing abscopal effects is 50% when a BED of 60 Gy is generated.
conclusionOur study provides evidence that SABR treatments associated with high BEDs could be considered an effective strategy in triggering the abscopal effect, thus shedding light on the promising outcomes revealed in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.