Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28222081›Full record

ArticleOncology nursing forum2017

Oncology Nursing Perceptions of Patient Electronic Portal Use: A Qualitative Analysis.

David E Gerber, Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Tobi Duncan, Mary Gill, Simon J Craddock Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Effects of an Online Patient Portal on Nurses' and the Health Care Team's Work in an Outpatient Oncology Setting: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Delivery of cancer care via an outpatient telephone support line: a cross-sectional study of oncology nursing perspectives on quality and challenges.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David E GerberUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Muhammad Shaalan BegUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Tobi DuncanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Mary GillUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Simon J Craddock LeeUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Southwestern Medical Center

Funding

UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
Development of New Cancer Treatments and InvestigatorsK24CA201543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GERBER, DAVID ERIC · 2016 to 2020
$737k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022418NCI NIH HHS K24 CA201543NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectivesTo identify nursing staff reactions to and perceptions of electronic portal use in a cancer setting.
. RESEARCH APPROACH: Qualitative.
.

settingOutpatient clinic at the Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
.

participants13 nurses with a range of credentials and experience, representing infusion, medical oncology, and bone marrow transplantation clinics.
. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Two focus groups were conducted. Theoretical thematic content analysis of data was performed.
.

findingsKey themes that emerged for consideration of electronic portals included work volume and flow, patient expectations and safety, variation in use of communication technologies, and education and management.
.

interpretationThe current study provides insight into the implications of electronic portals by identifying nursing staff reactions to this technology. These reactions are predominantly related to the impact on clinical workload and patient safety and expectations.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: As clinical cancer facilities incorporate electronic portal technology into their operations, attention to the impact on staff workload, division of labor, patient safety, and patient expectations should be considered.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing Staff, HospitalOncology NursingPatient PortalsQualitative ResearchTexascancercommunicationelectronic health recordselectronic portalsnursingpatient health records

Identifiers

PMID28222081
PMCPMC7066859
OpenAlexW2590808021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.