Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28222071›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2017

Combination of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat with bevacizumab in patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-arm phase I/II clinical trial.

Roberto Pili, Glenn Liu, Sreenivasulu Chintala, Hendrick Verheul, Shabnam Rehman, Kristopher Attwood, Martin A Lodge, Richard Wahl, James I Martin, Kiersten Marie Miles and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Histone deacetylases and their inhibitors in kidney diseases.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Progresses and Pitfalls of Epigenetics in Solid Tumors Clinical Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Roberto PiliGenitourinary Program, Indiana University-Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Glenn LiuUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Wisconsin, WI, USA.
Sreenivasulu ChintalaGenitourinary Program, Indiana University-Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Hendrick VerheulVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Shabnam RehmanRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Kristopher AttwoodRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Martin A LodgeJohns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Richard WahlJohns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
James I MartinPeninsula General Hospital, Santiago, Chile.
Kiersten Marie MilesRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Silvia PaesanteRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Remi AdelaiyeGenitourinary Program, Indiana University-Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Alejandro GodoyPontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Serina KingJohns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
James ZwiebelNational Cancer Institute-CTEP, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michael A CarducciJohns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University Health · USNational Cancer Institute · USPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
PHASE I TRIALS OF ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA070095 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CARDUCCI, MICHAEL A · 1995 to 2013
$8.6M
PHASE I TRIALS OF ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA062491 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LIU, GLENN · 1994 to 2013
$7.6M
Wisconsin and New Jersey Alliance in Precision Experimental TherapeuticsUM1CA186716 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI JABBOUR, SALMA, LIU, GLENN · 2014 to 2019
$4.1M
Targeting Tumor Angiogenesis with SAHA and Bevacizumab in Kidney CancerR21CA121590 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PILI, ROBERTO · 2007 to 2008
$498k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS R21 CA121590NCI NIH HHS U01 CA062491NCI NIH HHS U01 CA070095NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClass II histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors induce hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and -2α degradation and have antitumour effects in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. In this study, we tested the safety and efficacy of the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat and the VEGF blocker bevacizumab in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients previously treated with different drugs including sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, interleukin-2, interferon, and temsirolimus.

methodsPatients with up to two prior regimens were eligible for treatment, consisting of vorinostat 200 mg orally two times daily × 2 weeks, and bevacizumab 15 mg kg

resultsThirty-six patients were enrolled, with 33 evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. Eighteen patients had 1 prior treatment, 13 patients had 2 prior treatments, and 2 patients were treatment naïve. Two patients experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia and three patients had grade 3 thromboembolic events during the course of exposure. We observed six objective responses (18%), including one complete response and five partial responses. The proportion of patients with PFS at 6 months was 48%. The median PFS and overall survival were 5.7 months (confidence interval (CI): 4.1-11.0) and 13.9 months (CI: 9.8-20.7), respectively. Correlative studies showed that modulation of specific chemokines and microRNAs were associated with clinical benefit.

conclusionsThe combination of vorinostat with bevacizumab as described is relatively well tolerated. Response rate and median PFS suggest clinical activity for this combination strategy in previously treated ccRCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCytokinesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsImmunoenzyme TechniquesKidney NeoplasmsMaleBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCytokinesHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsMicroRNAsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanVorinostat

Identifiers

PMID28222071
PMCPMC5379145
OpenAlexW2589656556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.