Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28222058›Full record

ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2017

Classifiers for Accelerometer-Measured Behaviors in Older Women.

Dori Rosenberg, Suneeta Godbole, Katherine Ellis, Chongzhi Di, Andrea Lacroix, Loki Natarajan, Jacqueline Kerr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Validity of objective methods for measuring sedentary behaviour in older adults: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Classifying sitting, standing, and walking using plantar force data.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021
    Article
  13. The Relationship of Accelerometer-Assessed Standing Time With and Without Ambulation and Mortality: The WHI OPACH Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dori Rosenberg1Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA; 2Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; and 3Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Suneeta Godbole
Katherine Ellis
Chongzhi Di
Andrea Lacroix
Loki Natarajan
Jacqueline Kerr

Funding

Statistical methods for analyzing objectively measured physical activity dataR01HL130483 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Chongzhi Di · 2016 to 2026
$4.4M
Investigating Sedentary Time In Aging: New Directions Using Technology (iSTAND)K23HL119352 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI ROSENBERG, DORI E · 2014 to 2017
$564k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL119352NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMachine learning methods could better improve the detection of specific types of physical activities and sedentary behaviors from accelerometer data. No studies in older populations have developed and tested algorithms for walking and sedentary time in free-living daily life. Our goal was to rectify this gap by leveraging access to data from two studies in older women.

methodsIn study 1, algorithms were developed and tested in a sample of older women (N = 39, age range = 55-96 yr) in the field. Women wore accelerometers and SenseCam (ground truth annotation) devices for 7 d, yielding 3191 h and 320 d of data. Images were annotated and time matched to accelerometer data, and random forest classifiers labeled behaviors (sitting, riding in a vehicle, standing still, standing moving, and walking/running). In study 2, we examined the concurrent validity of the algorithms using accelerometer data from an observed 400-m walk test (2983 min of data available) and 6 d of wearing both accelerometers and global positioning systems devices in a sample of 222 women (age range = 67-100; 313,290 min of data available). Analyses included sensitivity, specificity balanced accuracy, and precision, as appropriate, averaged over each test participant at the minute level for each behavior.

resultsIn study 1, the algorithms had 82.2% balanced accuracy. In study 2, the classifier had 87.9% accuracy for predicting walking. Overall machine learning classifiers and global positioning systems had 88.6% agreement.

conclusionsFree-living algorithms for walking and sedentary time yielded high levels of accuracy and concurrent validity and can be applied to existing accelerometer data from older women.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHealth BehaviorSedentary BehaviorWalkingAccelerometryActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeographic Information SystemsHumansMachine LearningReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID28222058
PMCPMC5325142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.