Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28221352›Full record

ArticleNature chemistry2017

Dynamic undocking and the quasi-bound state as tools for drug discovery.

Sergio Ruiz-Carmona, Peter Schmidtke, F Javier Luque, Lisa Baker, Natalia Matassova, Ben Davis, Stephen Roughley, James Murray, Rod Hubbard, Xavier Barril

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Quasi-Bound State as a Predictor of Relative Binding Free Energy.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cosolvent Sites-Based Discovery ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sergio Ruiz-CarmonaInstitut de Biomedicina de la Universitat de Barcelona (IBUB) and Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Peter SchmidtkeDiscngine, 33 rue du Fauburg Saint-Antoine, 75011 Paris, France.
F Javier LuqueInstitut de Biomedicina de la Universitat de Barcelona (IBUB) and Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Lisa BakerVernalis (R&D) Ltd, Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6GB, UK.
Natalia MatassovaVernalis (R&D) Ltd, Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6GB, UK.
Ben DavisVernalis (R&D) Ltd, Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6GB, UK.
Stephen RoughleyVernalis (R&D) Ltd, Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6GB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0683-5693
James MurrayVernalis (R&D) Ltd, Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6GB, UK.
Rod HubbardVernalis (R&D) Ltd, Granta Park, Cambridge CB21 6GB, UK.
Xavier BarrilInstitut de Biomedicina de la Universitat de Barcelona (IBUB) and Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0281-1347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a pressing need for new technologies that improve the efficacy and efficiency of drug discovery. Structure-based methods have contributed towards this goal but they focus on predicting the binding affinity of protein-ligand complexes, which is notoriously difficult. We adopt an alternative approach that evaluates structural, rather than thermodynamic, stability. As bioactive molecules present a static binding mode, we devised dynamic undocking (DUck), a fast computational method to calculate the work necessary to reach a quasi-bound state at which the ligand has just broken the most important native contact with the receptor. This non-equilibrium property is surprisingly effective in virtual screening because true ligands form more-resilient interactions than decoys. Notably, DUck is orthogonal to docking and other 'thermodynamic' methods. We demonstrate the potential of the docking-undocking combination in a fragment screening against the molecular chaperone and oncology target Hsp90, for which we obtain novel chemotypes and a hit rate that approaches 40%.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMolecular Docking SimulationHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansLigandsMolecular StructurePharmaceutical PreparationsThermodynamicsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLigandsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID28221352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.