Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28220850›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparing the survival rate of juvenile Chinook salmon migrating through hydropower systems using injectable and surgical acoustic transmitters.

Z D Deng, J J Martinez, H Li, R A Harnish, C M Woodley, J A Hughes, X Li, T Fu, J Lu, G A McMichael and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Z D DengPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
J J MartinezPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
H LiPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
R A HarnishPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
C M WoodleyPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
J A HughesPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
X LiPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
T FuPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
J LuPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
G A McMichaelPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
M A WeilandPacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99332, USA.
M B EppardU.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 333 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97204, USA.
J R SkalskiSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1820, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
R L TownsendSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1820, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic telemetry is one of the primary technologies for studying the behavior and survival of fishes throughout the world. The size and performance of the transmitter are key limiting factors. The newly developed injectable transmitter is the first acoustic transmitter that can be implanted via injection instead of surgery. A two-part field study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the injectable transmitter and its effect on the survival of implanted fish. The injectable transmitter performed well and similarly to the proceeding generation of commercially-available JSATS transmitters tested concurrently. Snake River subyearling Chinook salmon smolts implanted with the injectable transmitter had a higher survival probability from release to each of eleven downstream detection arrays, because reach-specific survival estimates were significantly higher for the injectable group in three of the eleven reaches examined. Overall, the injectable group had a 0.263 (SE = 0.017) survival probability over the entire 500 km study area compared to 0.199 (0.012) for the surgically implanted group. The reduction in size and ability to implant the new transmitter via injection has reduced the tag or tagging effect bias associated with studying small fishes. The information gathered with this new technology is helping to evaluate the impacts of dams on fishes.

Indexed as

AcousticsAnimal MigrationAnimalsRiversSalmonTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID28220850
PMCPMC5318953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.