Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28220839›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

PTEN status is a crucial determinant of the functional outcome of combined MEK and mTOR inhibition in cancer.

Michele Milella, Italia Falcone, Fabiana Conciatori, Silvia Matteoni, Andrea Sacconi, Teresa De Luca, Chiara Bazzichetto, Vincenzo Corbo, Michele Simbolo, Isabella Sperduti and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele MilellaMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Italia FalconeMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Fabiana ConciatoriMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Silvia MatteoniMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Andrea SacconiTranslational Oncogenomic Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Teresa De LucaExperimental Chemotherapy Laboratory, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Chiara BazzichettoMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo CorboARC-Net Research Centre and Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Michele SimboloARC-Net Research Centre and Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Isabella SperdutiBiostatistics, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Antonina BenfanteDiBiMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Anais Del CuratoloMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Ursula Cesta IncaniMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Federico MalusaData Analysis Unit, Siena Biotech S.p.A. Siena, Italy.
Adriana EramoDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni SetteDiBiMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Aldo ScarpaARC-Net Research Centre and Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marina KonoplevaSection of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of  Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (TX), USA.
Michael AndreeffSection of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of  Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (TX), USA.
James Andrew McCubreyDepartment of Microbiology &Immunology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville (NC), USA.
Giovanni BlandinoTranslational Oncogenomic Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Matilde TodaroDiBiMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giorgio StassiDiBiMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Ruggero De MariaScientific Direction, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Francesco CognettiMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Donatella Del BufaloExperimental Chemotherapy Laboratory, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Ludovica CiuffredaMedical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITUniversity of Verona · ITThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USEast Carolina University · USIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITSiena Biotech (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combined MAPK/PI3K pathway inhibition represents an attractive, albeit toxic, therapeutic strategy in oncology. Since PTEN lies at the intersection of these two pathways, we investigated whether PTEN status determines the functional response to combined pathway inhibition. PTEN (gene, mRNA, and protein) status was extensively characterized in a panel of cancer cell lines and combined MEK/mTOR inhibition displayed highly synergistic pharmacologic interactions almost exclusively in PTEN-loss models. Genetic manipulation of PTEN status confirmed a mechanistic role for PTEN in determining the functional outcome of combined pathway blockade. Proteomic analysis showed greater phosphoproteomic profile modification(s) in response to combined MEK/mTOR inhibition in PTEN-loss contexts and identified JAK1/STAT3 activation as a potential mediator of synergistic interactions. Overall, our results show that PTEN-loss is a crucial determinant of synergistic interactions between MAPK and PI3K pathway inhibitors, potentially exploitable for the selection of cancer patients at the highest chance of benefit from combined therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorDrug SynergismEverolimusFemaleHumansJanus Kinase 1MAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMiceMice, NudeNeoplastic Stem CellsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPTEN PhosphohydrolaseEverolimusJAK1 protein, humanJanus Kinase 1MAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMTOR protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanPyridonesPyrimidinonesRNA, Small InterferingSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription FactorTOR Serine-Threonine Kinasestrametinib

Identifiers

PMID28220839
PMCPMC5318947
OpenAlexW2591365298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.