ArticleNature communications2017
Understanding the glacial methane cycle.
Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993-2017.National science review · 2022Article
- Polar amplification of Pliocene climate by elevated trace gas radiative forcing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Thermochemical oxidation of methane induced by high-valence metal oxides in a sedimentary basin.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Enhanced response of global wetland methane emissions to the 2015-2016 El Niño-Southern Oscillation event.Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2018Article
- Bayesian Analysis of the Glacial-Interglacial Methane Increase Constrained by Stable Isotopes and Earth System Modeling.Geophysical research letters · 2018Article
- Emerging role of wetland methane emissions in driving 21st century climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Glacial/interglacial wetland, biomass burning, and geologic methane emissions constrained by dual stable isotopic CHProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atmospheric methane (CH
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.