Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28220753›Full record

Trial reporteLife2017

High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical brain-computer interface.

Chethan Pandarinath, Paul Nuyujukian, Christine H Blabe, Brittany L Sorice, Jad Saab, Francis R Willett, Leigh R Hochberg, Krishna V Shenoy, Jaimie M Henderson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00912041 (BrainGate2), which is not on this map. Cited by 226 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
25.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00912041 narecruitingnot on this map

BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Tetraplegia

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeigh R. Hochberg, MD, PhD.Ran2009 to 2038Enrolled27ConditionsTetraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Brain Stem InfarctionsArmsPlacement of the BrainGate2 sensor(s) into the motor-related cortex
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 573 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. In conversation with Sergey Stavisky.Nature neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Chethan PandarinathDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-1432
Paul NuyujukianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Christine H BlabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Brittany L SoriceDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States.
Jad SaabSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, United States.
Francis R WillettDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States.
Leigh R HochbergDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0261-2273
Krishna V ShenoyElectrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Jaimie M HendersonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3276-2267
Neurosciences Institute · USBoston University · USBrown University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USStanford University · US

Funding

Engaging new cognitive and motor signals to improve communication prosthesesR01DC014034 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JAIMIE M HENDERSON · 2015 to 2026
$8.2M
Restoring Communication with an Intracortical Neural Interface SystemR01DC009899 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2009 to 2017
$7.0M
Toward an Animal Model of Freely Moving HumansR01NS066311 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLACK, MICHAEL J, SHENOY, KRISHNA V · 2009 to 2012
$2.9M
Influencing Children's Beliefs Through LanguageR03HD053403 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KEEN, RACHEL ELIZABETH · 2007 to 2008
$150k
NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD053403NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009899NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014034NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS066311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have the potential to restore communication for people with tetraplegia and anarthria by translating neural activity into control signals for assistive communication devices. While previous pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated promising proofs-of-concept (Serruya et al., 2002; Simeral et al., 2011; Bacher et al., 2015; Nuyujukian et al., 2015; Aflalo et al., 2015; Gilja et al., 2015; Jarosiewicz et al., 2015; Wolpaw et al., 1998; Hwang et al., 2012; Spüler et al., 2012; Leuthardt et al., 2004; Taylor et al., 2002; Schalk et al., 2008; Moran, 2010; Brunner et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013; Townsend and Platsko, 2016; Vansteensel et al., 2016; Nuyujukian et al., 2016; Carmena et al., 2003; Musallam et al., 2004; Santhanam et al., 2006; Hochberg et al., 2006; Ganguly et al., 2011; O'Doherty et al., 2011; Gilja et al., 2012), the performance of human clinical BCI systems is not yet high enough to support widespread adoption by people with physical limitations of speech. Here we report a high-performance intracortical BCI (iBCI) for communication, which was tested by three clinical trial participants with paralysis. The system leveraged advances in decoder design developed in prior pre-clinical and clinical studies (Gilja et al., 2015; Kao et al., 2016; Gilja et al., 2012). For all three participants, performance exceeded previous iBCIs (Bacher et al., 2015; Jarosiewicz et al., 2015) as measured by typing rate (by a factor of 1.4-4.2) and information throughput (by a factor of 2.2-4.0). This high level of performance demonstrates the potential utility of iBCIs as powerful assistive communication devices for people with limited motor function.Clinical Trial No: NCT00912041.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesCommunicationParalysisHumansTreatment OutcomeALSassistive technologybrain-machine interfacehumanhuman biologymedicineneural prosthesisneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID28220753
PMCPMC5319839
OpenAlexW2589952473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.