Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28220321›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

A snapshot of Chlamydia trachomatis genetic diversity using multilocus sequence type analysis in an Australian metropolitan setting.

J A Danielewski, S Phillips, F Y S Kong, K S Smith, J S Hocking, R Guy, C K Fairley, S M Garland, S N Tabrizi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome organization and genomics inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  2. Microorganisms · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J A DanielewskiDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Parkville, 3052, VIC, Australia. jennifer.danielewski@mcri.edu.au.
S PhillipsDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Parkville, 3052, VIC, Australia.
F Y S KongMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
K S SmithThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J S HockingMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
R GuyThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
C K FairleyMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
S M GarlandDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Parkville, 3052, VIC, Australia.
S N TabriziDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Parkville, 3052, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution screening methodologies which enable the differentiation of Chlamydia trachomatis at the strain level, directly from clinical samples, can provide the detailed information required for epidemiological questions such as the dynamics of treatment failure. In addition, they give a detailed snapshot of circulating C. trachomatis genetic variation, data which are currently lacking for the Australian population. In the context of two Australian clinical trials, we assessed the genetic diversity of C. trachomatis and compared these to strains circulating globally. We used high-resolution multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of five highly variable genetic regions of C. trachomatis to examine variation in Australia. Samples with established genovars were drawn from a pool of 880 C. trachomatis-positive samples from two clinical studies, whereby 76 sample pairs which remained C. trachomatis-positive for the same genovar after treatment underwent MLST analysis to distinguish between treatment failure and reinfection. MLST analysis revealed a total of 25 sequence types (STs), six new allele variants and seven new STs not described anywhere else in the world, when compared to those in the international C. trachomatis MLST database. Of the eight most common global STs, seven were found in Australia (four derived from men who have sex with men (MSM) and three from heterosexuals). Newly identified STs were predominantly found in samples from the MSM population. In conclusion, MLST provided a diverse C. trachomatis strain profile, with novel circulating STs, and could be used to identify local sexual networks to focus on interventions such as testing and partner notification to prevent reinfection.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationMultilocus Sequence TypingAustraliaChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMolecular EpidemiologyUrban Population

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.