Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28220300›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2017

Application of confocal laser scanning microscopy for the diagnosis of amyloidosis.

Chiara Castellani, Marny Fedrigo, Anna Chiara Frigo, Mila Della Barbera, Gaetano Thiene, Marialuisa Valente, Fausto Adami, Annalisa Angelini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiara CastellaniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Via Gabelli 61, 35100, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-4864
Marny FedrigoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Via Gabelli 61, 35100, Padova, Italy.
Anna Chiara FrigoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Via Gabelli 61, 35100, Padova, Italy.
Mila Della BarberaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Via Gabelli 61, 35100, Padova, Italy.
Gaetano ThieneDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Via Gabelli 61, 35100, Padova, Italy.
Marialuisa ValenteDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Via Gabelli 61, 35100, Padova, Italy.
Fausto AdamiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Annalisa AngeliniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Via Gabelli 61, 35100, Padova, Italy. annalisa.angelini@unipd.it.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analysed specificity and sensitivity of confocal laser microscopy (CLSM) on tissue sections for a diagnosis of amyloidosis, in an attempt to reduce technical errors and better standardise pathological diagnosis. We first set up a protocol for the use of CLSM on this type of specimen, using a group of 20 amyloid negative and 20 positive samples. Of all specimens, 2, 4 and 8-μm sections were cut. Sections were stained with Congo red (CR) and thioflavin-T (ThT) and observed by cross-polarised light microscopy (CR-PL), epifluorescence microscopy (CRF-epiFM and ThT-epiFM) and CLSM (CRF-CLSM and ThT-CLSM). To validate the method in a diagnostic setting, we examined tissue samples from 116 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of amyloidosis, selected from the period 2005 to 2014 from the database of the Pathology Unit of the University of Padua. The results were compared with those of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which we consider as reference. We found that with CRF-CLSM, the false negative rate was reduced from 17 to 5%, while the sensitivity of detection increased to 12%. The results were in complete agreement with those of TEM ThT-CLSM; both sensitivity and specificity were 100%. Finally, ThT-CLSM results did not vary with section thickness, and small amounts of amyloid could even be detected in 2-μm sections. In conclusion, we found ThT-CLSM to be more sensitive as a screening method for amyloidosis than CR and ThT epifluorescence optical imaging. The method was easier to standardise, provided images with better resolution and resulted in more consistent pathologist diagnoses.

Indexed as

AmyloidosisColoring AgentsCongo RedFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionSensitivity and SpecificityColoring AgentsCongo RedAmyloidConfocal laser microscopyCongo red fluorescenceHistologyThioflavin-T

Identifiers

PMID28220300
OpenAlexW2590094359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.