Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28220287›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2017

The yield of initial conventional MRI in 115 cases of angiographically confirmed spinal vascular malformations.

Amgad El Mekabaty, Carlos A Pardo, Philippe Gailloud

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of spinal angiography in the evaluation and treatment of pediatric spinal vascular pathology: a case series and systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amgad El MekabatyDivision of Interventional Neuroradiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 E Orleans Street, Bloomberg 7216, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Carlos A PardoDepartment of Neurology, Division of Neuroimmunology and Neuroinfectious Disorders and Johns Hopkins Transverse Myelitis Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Philippe GailloudDivision of Interventional Neuroradiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 E Orleans Street, Bloomberg 7216, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. phg@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0768-3273
Bloomberg (United States) · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI is the primary screening tool for patients with myelopathy. The decision to obtain additional imaging, notably spinal angiography, is generally based on initial MRI findings. This study retrospectively analyzed the yield of initial MRI in a cohort of patients with angiographically confirmed vascular malformations. MRI obtained at symptom onset was available in 115 patients with either high-flow (29 cases) or low-flow (86 cases) vascular malformations. MRI was classified as "positive" when the report mentioned a vascular malformation or "negative" when considered normal or when another diagnosis was suggested. Initial MRI was positive in 61 patients (53.0%), correctly identifying 28 high-flow (96.6%) but only 33 low-flow (38.4%) lesions. Flow voids were noted in 96.6% of the high-flow lesions and 38.4% of the low-flow ones. T2-signal anomalies (77.4%) and parenchymal enhancement (54.5%) were also common in low-flow anomalies. Patients with negative MRI had an average delay of 111 days before angiography and 239 days before therapy; these intervals were 27 and 76 days for those with positive MRIs. In summary, MRI shows a high yield for high-flow vascular malformations, i.e., characterized by prominent flow voids on T2-weighted images, but misdiagnosed over 60% of low-flow lesions. The percentage of correctly identified anomalies matched the percentage of observed flow voids in both groups, indicating over-reliance on this sign for the diagnosis of slow-flow lesions. MRI findings in slow-flow vascular malformation overlap with other conditions, notably transverse myelitis, which was initially misattributed to 40% of the slow-flow lesions in our cohort.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiography, Digital SubtractionChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfantMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic errorsDiagnostic imagingMyelopathySpinal vascular disordersVascular malformations

Identifiers

PMID28220287
OpenAlexW2590764650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.