Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28220251›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2017

Triple aim improvement for individuals, services and society in dementia care : The DementiaNet collaborative care approach.

M S Nieuwboer, A Richters, M A van der Marck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M S NieuwboerRadboudumc Alzheimer Center, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, PO 9101 (hp 925), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A RichtersRadboudumc Alzheimer Center, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, PO 9101 (hp 925), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M A van der MarckRadboudumc Alzheimer Center, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, PO 9101 (hp 925), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Marjolein.vanderMarck@radboudumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA redesigning of primary care is required to meet dementia patients' needs. In the Netherlands, current dementia care still falls short in areas including ad hoc collaboration, lack of feedback on quality to professionals involved, and insufficient implementation of established multidisciplinary guidelines.

objectiveDementiaNet is a collaborative care approach, which aims to reduce the burden of the disease on individuals, healthcare services and society via network-based care that encourages collaboration, enhances knowledge and skills and stimulates quality improvement cycles. MATERIAL AND

methodsDementiaNet was developed to support primary care networks through implementation of five core processes: network-based care, clinical leadership, quality improvement cycles, interprofessional practice-based training and communication support tools, following a stepwise tailor-made approach. Alongside this, a mixed method study was designed to evaluate innovation and effectiveness.

resultsCurrently, 18 networks have been formed. These vary in quality of care and strength of collaboration due to local circumstances. Initial activities and goals of each network also vary, ranging from acquaintance to shared care plans. Ongoing research will identify barriers, facilitators and merits of the approach in increasing quality of care and ultimately improving outcomes for patient, carer, health service and society.

conclusionInitial results show that clinical practice varies and the DementiaNet approach can lead to quality improvement. Complexity and variety of local care requires complex interventions and evaluation methods that account for this in order to safeguard the value for practice. Strict methodology lessens external validity.

Indexed as

Organizational ObjectivesAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaEuropeFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleModels, OrganizationalNetherlandsPatient Care ManagementPatient Care TeamPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementCollaborative careDementiaInterprofessional collaborationMultidisciplinary teamPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID28220251
PMCPMC5409810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.