Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28220053›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer science and systems biology2016

Simulation Study on Effects of Order and Step Size of Runge-Kutta Methods that Solve Contagious Disease and Tumor Models.

Z Wang, Q Wang, D J Klinke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer science and systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Z WangDepartment of Computer Science, Mathematics and Engineering, Shepherd University, Shepherdstown, WV 25443, USA.
Q WangDepartment of Computer Science, Mathematics and Engineering, Shepherd University, Shepherdstown, WV 25443, USA.
D J KlinkeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 25606, USA; Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 25606, USA.

Funding

WV INBRE: The Inhibitor of Growth Family Member 4 (ING4) inhibits L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT1) expression to suppress Breast CancerP20GM103434 · NIGMS · MARSHALL UNIVERSITY · PI Travis Salisbury · 2012 to 2026
$61.1M
Integrative systems approach to identify local oncogenic modulation of the IL12 axisR01CA193473 · NCI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI KLINKE, DAVID JOHN · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193473NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological processes such as contagious disease spread patterns and tumor growth dynamics are modelled using a set of coupled differential equations. Experimental data is usually used to calibrate models so they can be used to make future predictions. In this study, numerical methods were implemented to approximate solutions to mathematical models that were not solvable analytically, such as a SARS model. More complex models such as a tumor growth model involve high-dimensional parameter spaces; efficient numerical simulation techniques were used to search for optimal or close-to-optimal parameter values in the equations. Runge-Kutta methods are a group of explicit and implicit numerical methods that effectively solve the ordinary differential equations in these models. Effects of the order and the step size of Runge-Kutta methods were studied in order to maximize the search accuracy and efficiency in parameter spaces of the models. Numerical simulation results showed that an order of four gave the best balance between truncation errors and the simulation speed for SIR, SARS, and tumormodels studied in the project. The optimal step size for differential equation solvers was found to be model-dependent.

Indexed as

Adaptive evolutionary algorithmsRunge-Kutta methodsSimulation metrics

Identifiers

PMID28220053
PMCPMC5316286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.