Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28219952›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2017

Enthesis regeneration: a role for Gli1+ progenitor cells.

Andrea G Schwartz, Leesa M Galatz, Stavros Thomopoulos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development of a Mouse Model of Enthesis-Specific NF-κB Activation.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interfacial Tissue Regeneration with Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024
    Review
  12. A role for TGFβ signaling in Gli1+ tendon and enthesis cells.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Hedgehog Activation for Enhanced Rotator Cuff Tendon-to-Bone Healing.The American journal of sports medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Anatomical Tissue Engineering of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Entheses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. RAB23 regulates musculoskeletal development and patterning.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea G SchwartzDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Leesa M GalatzDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Stavros ThomopoulosDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA sat2@columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1531-4849
Columbia University · USMount Sinai Health System · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Skeletal Disorders Training ProgramT32AR060719 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Roberto Civitelli · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
Tendon Enthesis Development and RegenerationR01AR055580 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI THOMOPOULOS, STAVROS · 2009 to 2019
$4.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055580NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR060719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tendon enthesis originates from a specific pool of hedgehog-active Gli1+ progenitor cells that differentiate and produce mineralized fibrocartilage. The current study investigated the regenerative capacity of this cell population by comparing the responses of early postnatal and mature entheses to injury. Lineage tracing studies demonstrated that the original Gli1+ cell population had the capacity to heal immature entheses after injury, but this capacity was lost after the cells differentiated into mature fibrochondrocytes. To further examine the involvement of Gli1+ cells and hedgehog signaling in enthesis healing, Gli1 expression was examined via lineage tracing approaches and the effect of Smo deletion was examined in the injured entheses. Immature injured entheses retained high levels of Gli1 expression, a marker of hedgehog activation, consistent with non-injured controls. In contrast, injured mature entheses had few Gli1+ cells early in the healing process, with limited recovery of the cell population later in the healing process. These results suggest that the presence of activated hedgehog signaling in enthesis cells early in the healing process may enhance healing of enthesis injuries by mimicking developmental processes.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageMiceStem CellsTendonsWound HealingZinc Finger Protein GLI1Gli1 protein, mouseZinc Finger Protein GLI1EnthesisFibrocartilageHedgehogRegenerationStem cellTendon

Identifiers

PMID28219952
PMCPMC5399618
OpenAlexW2591198681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.