Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28219407›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Development of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in Aedes japonicus and Aedes geniculatus.

Cornelia Silaghi, Relja Beck, Gioia Capelli, Fabrizio Montarsi, Alexander Mathis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence, spatial distribution and risk mapping ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. InvasiveInsects · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Complete mitogenome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evidence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Identification of potential vectors ofPathogens and global health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cornelia SilaghiNational Centre for Vector Entomology, Institute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. cornelia.silaghi@uzh.ch.
Relja BeckDepartment for Bacteriology and Parasitology, Croatian Veterinary Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Gioia CapelliLaboratory of Parasitology, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Italy.
Fabrizio MontarsiLaboratory of Parasitology, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Italy.
Alexander MathisNational Centre for Vector Entomology, Institute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITUniversity of Zurich · CHCroatian Veterinary Institute · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mosquito-borne filarial nematodes Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens primarily affect dogs but also cats, causing heartworm disease or subcutaneous dirofilariosis, respectively, and both may also cause zoonotic diseases in humans. Several mosquito species have been reported as competent vectors for these nematodes, but no data are available for the invasive mosquito species Aedes japonicus (Theobald, 1901). The objective of this study was to describe the development of both D. immitis and D. repens under standardised experimental laboratory conditions in mosquitoes.

methodsFor this purpose, both a laboratory strain and field-collected individuals of the invasive mosquito species Ae. japonicus and, for comparative purposes, a laboratory strain of Aedes geniculatus, a rare indigenous species sharing habitats with Ae. japonicus, and of the tropical species Aedes aegypti were used. Anticoagulated microfilariaemic blood was fed at a density of 3000 mf/ml to mosquitoes with a hemotek system. Blood-fed mosquitoes were incubated at 27 °C and 85% relative humidity, and specimens were dissected under the microscope at pre-set time points to observe developmental stages of both Dirofilaria species. Additionally, real-time PCRs were carried out in some microscopically negative samples to determine the infection rates.

resultsIn field-collected Ae. japonicus infectious L3 larvae of both D. immitis and D. repens developed, rendering this mosquito species an efficient vector for both filarial species. Additionally, Ae. geniculatus was shown to be an equally efficient vector for both filarial species. Aedes japonicus mosquitoes from a laboratory colony were refractory to D. immitis but susceptible to D. repens, whereas Ae. aegypti was refractory to both filarial species.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, Aedes japonicus was for the first time shown to be an efficient vector for both D. immitis and D. repens, indicating that this invasive and locally highly abundant species may contribute to a transmission of filarial worms. The data emphasize the necessity to perform vector competence studies with local mosquito populations as basis for risk assessments. We further demonstrated that detection of filarial DNA in a mosquito species alone does not allow to draw reliable conclusions with regard to its vector competence.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsDirofilaria immitisDirofilaria repensDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsFeeding BehaviorInsect VectorsLarvaAedes aegyptiAedes geniculatusAedes japonicusDirofilaria immitisDirofilaria repensDogIntermediate hostMicrofilariaeVector

Identifiers

PMID28219407
PMCPMC5319011
OpenAlexW2590854878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.