Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28219348›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Distribution based nearest neighbor imputation for truncated high dimensional data with applications to pre-clinical and clinical metabolomics studies.

Jasmit S Shah, Shesh N Rai, Andrew P DeFilippis, Bradford G Hill, Aruni Bhatnagar, Guy N Brock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Heterogeneous Causes of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Correlate With Distinct Peripheral Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Metabolites.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. LC-MS profiling ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The metabolic domestication syndrome of budding yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Data analysis methods for defining biomarkers from omics data.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasmit S ShahDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. jasmit.shah@louisville.edu.
Shesh N RaiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Andrew P DeFilippisDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Diabetes and Obesity Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Bradford G HillDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Diabetes and Obesity Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Aruni BhatnagarDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Diabetes and Obesity Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Guy N BrockDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. Guy.Brock@osumc.edu.

Funding

Project 5 - Metabolomic Analysis of AtherothrombosisP20GM103492 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI DEFILIPPIS, ANDREW · 2012 to 2017
$13.8M
Metabolic optimization of cell therapyR01HL130174 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HILL, BRADFORD GUY · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130174NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh throughput metabolomics makes it possible to measure the relative abundances of numerous metabolites in biological samples, which is useful to many areas of biomedical research. However, missing values (MVs) in metabolomics datasets are common and can arise due to both technical and biological reasons. Typically, such MVs are substituted by a minimum value, which may lead to different results in downstream analyses.

resultsHere we present a modified version of the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) approach which accounts for truncation at the minimum value, i.e., KNN truncation (KNN-TN). We compare imputation results based on KNN-TN with results from other KNN approaches such as KNN based on correlation (KNN-CR) and KNN based on Euclidean distance (KNN-EU). Our approach assumes that the data follow a truncated normal distribution with the truncation point at the detection limit (LOD). The effectiveness of each approach was analyzed by the root mean square error (RMSE) measure as well as the metabolite list concordance index (MLCI) for influence on downstream statistical testing. Through extensive simulation studies and application to three real data sets, we show that KNN-TN has lower RMSE values compared to the other two KNN procedures as well as simpler imputation methods based on substituting missing values with the metabolite mean, zero values, or the LOD. MLCI values between KNN-TN and KNN-EU were roughly equivalent, and superior to the other four methods in most cases.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that KNN-TN generally has improved performance in imputing the missing values of the different datasets compared to KNN-CR and KNN-EU when there is missingness due to missing at random combined with an LOD. The results shown in this study are in the field of metabolomics but this method could be applicable with any high throughput technology which has missing due to LOD.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomedical ResearchMetabolomicsComputational BiologyHumansHigh dimensional dataImputationK-nearest neighborsMetabolomicsMissing valueTruncated normal

Identifiers

PMID28219348
PMCPMC5319174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.