Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28218215›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2017

Correlation between Condylar Fracture Pattern after Parasymphyseal Impact and Condyle Morphological Features: A Retrospective Analysis of 107 Chinese Patients.

Lu Han, Ting Long, Wei Tang, Lei Liu, Wei Jing, Wei-Dong Tian, Jie Long

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lu HanState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Ting LongDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Wei TangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Lei LiuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Wei JingDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Wei-Dong TianDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Jie LongState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of the condylar fractures is difficult. Factors that result in the fractures are complex. The objective of this morphometric study was to investigate the relationship between condylar fracture patterns and condylar morphological characteristics.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 patients admitted to the West China Hospital of Stomatology for bilateral condylar fractures caused by parasymphyseal impact. The patients were divided into five groups according to the type of condylar fracture. Ten parameters were evaluated on three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction mandible models through the Mimics 16.0 (Materialize Leuven, Belgium) anthropometry toolkit. Each parameter of the 3D models was analyzed using multivariate analysis. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relationships between the five groups.

resultsThe results showed that the differences of condylar head width (M1), condylar neck width (M3), the ratio of condylar head width to condylar anteroposterior diameter (M1/M2), the ratio of condylar head width to condylar neck width (M1/M3), the ratio of condylar height to ramus height (M8/M7), and mandibular angle (M10) were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Type A condylar head fractures were positively associated with M1 (compared to Type B: OR =1.627, 95% CI: 1.123, 2.359; compared to Type C: OR = 1.705, 95% CI: 1.170, 2.484) and M1/M2 (compared to Type B: OR =1.034, 95% CI: 0.879, 2.484). Type B condylar head fractures were negatively associated with M10 (compared to Type C: OR = 0.909, 95% CI: 0.821, 1.007). Condylar neck fractures were negatively associated with M3 (compared to condylar head: OR = 0.382, CI: 0.203, 0.720 ; compared to condylar base: OR = 0.436, 95% CI: 0.218, 0.874), and positively associated with M1/M3 (compared to condylar head: OR = 1.229, 95% CI: 1.063, 1.420 compared to condylar base: OR = 1.223, 95% CI: 1.034, 1.447). Condylar base fractures were positively associated with M10 (OR = 1.095, 95% CI: 1.008, 1.189) and negatively associated with M8/M7 (OR = 0.855, 95% CI: 0.763, 0.959) as compared with condylar head fractures.

conclusionsCondylar fracture pattern is associated with the anatomical features of the condyles when a fracture occurs from parasymphyseal impact.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMandibular CondyleMandibular FracturesMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28218215
PMCPMC5324378
OpenAlexW2586722172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.